Skip to main content

Security report for fengemail.com

深圳千刻网络科技有限公司 · Technology · China

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

深圳千刻网络科技有限公司运营的蜂邮EDM邮件营销平台，专注于为企业提供专业的邮件群发解决方案。其产品线涵盖标准版、外贸版、企业版及定制版，支持邮箱列表管理、邮件可视化编辑、批量群发及数据统计分析，满足不同企业的邮件营销需求。网站内容丰富，面向中国及国际市场的企业用户，尤其是外贸和B2B领域。技术上采用现代前端框架和多种分析工具，具备良好的移动优化和SEO表现。安全方面，网站启用HTTPS，但缺少部分安全头和隐私合规机制。WHOIS信息缺失，存在一定信任风险。整体网站专业度高，适合目标客户使用。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fengemail.com

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

蜂邮EDM平台在邮件营销行业中定位为专业且多版本的邮件群发服务商，具备定制开发能力，支持大规模邮件发送和多IP轮播技术。其业务模式为SaaS结合定制开发，目标客户为需要高效邮件营销的企业，尤其是外贸B2B客户。网站展示了多个客户评价和丰富的产品功能，显示出一定的市场认可度和客户基础。合作伙伴和友情链接广泛，形成了较为完善的生态圈。缺乏公开的财务和成立年份信息，规模推测为小型企业。

Security posture

网站采用HTTPS保障数据传输安全，未发现明显的安全漏洞或敏感信息泄露。使用了Google Analytics、Facebook Pixel及百度统计等多种追踪工具，但未见明确的cookie同意机制，存在隐私合规风险。缺少安全策略、事件响应及漏洞披露信息，建议完善安全管理文档和联系方式。WHOIS信息缺失降低了域名的信任度，建议核实域名注册状态。整体安全成熟度中等，适合业务开展但需加强合规和安全透明度。

Recommendations

  1. 完善网站安全头配置，增强防护能力。
  2. 增加并公开隐私政策和cookie同意机制，提升合规性。
  3. 发布安全政策和事件响应联系方式，增强用户信任。
  4. 核实并公开域名注册信息，解决WHOIS缺失问题。
  5. 持续监控和优化邮件发送安全，防止滥用和黑名单风险。
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
深圳千刻网络科技有限公司
Description
蜂邮EDM专业研发邮件发送软件及邮件营销平台解决方案，提供标准版、外贸版、企业版、定制版及SMTP接口服务。服务包括邮箱列表管理、邮件可视化制作、触发式邮件推送、主动群发及数据分析。
Key services
邮件群发平台, EDM邮件营销系统, 邮箱列表管理, 邮件可视化编辑, 邮件批量群发, 邮件数据统计分析, SMTP接口服务
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Baidu Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics and tracking scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Baidu Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Baidu Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese, targeting Chinese-speaking business users.
  3. No explicit privacy cookie consent mechanism found despite tracking scripts.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Multiple external links to related business and partner domains.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. Contact email found but no phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  9. Website has ICP备案 number indicating Chinese regulatory compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

网站基于现代前端技术栈构建，使用Bootstrap框架和多种JavaScript库，支持响应式设计和良好的用户体验。集成了多种第三方分析和营销工具，便于数据驱动的业务决策。页面结构清晰，SEO优化良好。性能表现中等，加载速度适中。缺少CMS信息，可能为定制开发。建议优化无障碍支持和进一步提升性能以增强用户体验。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fengemail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fengemail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.