Skip to main content

Security report for feedify.info

feedify · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feedify.info is a technology-focused SaaS platform specializing in web push notifications for browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. The service aims to help website owners and marketers retarget visitors and recover traffic that might otherwise be lost, positioning itself as a smart engagement and conversion tool. The website content is professional and targeted towards business users seeking marketing automation solutions. Technically, the site uses modern frontend libraries including Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v2 for security on its login form. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and employs CSRF tokens to protect form submissions. However, the absence of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. No WHOIS registrant data is available due to TLD restrictions and privacy protections, which is common but slightly reduces transparency. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with good technical foundations but needs enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedify.info

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention feedify.info, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for feedify.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Feedify operates in the competitive web push notification market, targeting digital marketers and website owners who want to increase user engagement and conversion rates. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering subscription or usage-based services for push notification campaigns. The company leverages a CDN domain (feedify.net) for asset delivery, indicating a distributed infrastructure. The lack of public contact information and corporate details on the login page suggests a focus on existing customers or a gated service model. The platform's integration of Google reCAPTCHA and CSRF tokens shows awareness of security best practices, which is important for maintaining customer trust. The absence of privacy and cookie policies on this page may impact GDPR compliance and user trust, especially for European users. The company appears to be a small technology entity with a consistent brand presence but limited public business transparency on this page.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures via Google reCAPTCHA on the login form. The presence of CSRF tokens further protects against common web attacks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, or cross-site scripting risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms reduces the site's transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but could be significantly improved with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  3. Add a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Include clear contact information for support and security incident response to enhance trust and responsiveness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
feedify
Description
Web Push Notifications for Chrome, Firefox and Safari. Smartest way to retarget visitors and recover traffic dropping off from your site. Engage and retain your target audience with Feedify.
Key services
Web Push Notifications, Visitor Retargeting, Traffic Recovery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Popper.js, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token in login form
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 integration on login form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for Feedify, a web push notification service.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to TLD restrictions and privacy.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  4. Login form uses CSRF token and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot protection.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers found on this page.
  6. External resources are loaded from feedify.net and Google domains.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery and Popper.js for UI interactions, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. Assets are served from a dedicated CDN domain (cdn.feedify.net), which likely improves load times and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized with viewport meta tags and responsive layout. However, SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no Open Graph or structured data detected. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks evident in the provided HTML. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and minimal inline styles. The lack of CMS or backend technology indicators suggests a custom or lightweight platform. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedify.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedify.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.