Skip to main content

Security report for feedbackify.com

Feedbackify Limited · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feedbackify Limited operates a website feedback tool service designed to help website owners collect visitor feedback, ideas, and satisfaction metrics to improve their online presence. The company positions itself as a simple, privacy-conscious SaaS provider with a focus on keeping visitors on the client's site during feedback collection. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content for its target audience of website owners and businesses seeking feedback solutions. Technically, the site uses legacy jQuery versions and Google Analytics for tracking, hosted partially on Amazon S3 for static assets. While the site is functional and moderately optimized, there are areas for improvement in mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and modern technology adoption. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking modern security headers and using outdated JavaScript libraries, which introduces potential vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the website is trustworthy and legitimate but would benefit from technical and security enhancements to improve user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedbackify.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Feedbackify operates in the technology sector as a small SaaS provider specializing in website feedback tools. Its business model is subscription-based with a free trial offering. The company targets website owners who want to gather actionable visitor feedback without disrupting user experience. The market position is niche with emphasis on simplicity and privacy. The presence of customer testimonials and clear terms indicates a focus on trust-building. The lack of social media presence and limited contact information suggests a lean operation. The company leverages Amazon S3 for hosting static assets and Google Analytics for visitor insights. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. Growth indicators are not explicit but the service addresses a common business need for customer feedback.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Feedbackify's website is basic. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.3.2) is a significant security concern as it may contain known vulnerabilities. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which may lead to GDPR compliance issues. Incident response and security policies are not published, limiting transparency. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were found in the HTML content. Overall, the site demonstrates foundational security but requires updates and enhancements to meet modern security standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feedbackify Limited
Description
Feedbackify provides a website feedback tool that allows site owners to gather visitor feedback, ideas, and suggestions to improve visitor satisfaction and protect their brand.
Key services
Website feedback collection, Visitor satisfaction measurement, Idea and suggestion gathering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides clear business purpose and services
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on main page
  3. Privacy and terms pages linked in footer
  4. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance
  6. No explicit security headers detected
  7. Google Analytics used for visitor tracking
  8. No social media links found
  9. No visible forms on main page except feedback tab loaded via script
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy jQuery versions (1.3.2 and 3.4.1) which indicates technical debt and potential security risks. Static assets are hosted on Amazon S3, suggesting a cloud-based hosting approach for media. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, but no advanced marketing or retargeting tools were detected. The site lacks modern front-end frameworks or CMS indications, implying a custom or minimalistic build. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility and mobile optimization are basic, with room for improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, requiring modernization to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedbackify.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedbackify.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.