Skip to main content

Security report for feed-image-editor.sk

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. operates a specialized SaaS platform focused on bulk editing and enhancement of e-commerce product images to improve online sales performance. The company targets e-commerce businesses seeking automated image tuning solutions, offering features such as background removal, resolution enhancement, and campaign scheduling integrated with advertising platforms. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and includes strong trust signals from recognized review platforms and industry associations. Technically, the site runs on Drupal 7 with modern marketing and analytics integrations, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieHub for GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and formal policies are absent. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and trustworthy, supporting a high legitimacy score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feed-image-editor.sk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche in the e-commerce technology sector, providing a SaaS product that automates product image optimization for online retailers. Its subscription-based business model includes a 30-day free trial and integration with Mergado Store, indicating a partnership ecosystem. The presence of multiple language versions and marketing tools suggests a growth-oriented approach targeting Central European markets. Trust indicators such as badges from Capterra, SourceForge, and SoftwareAdvice enhance credibility. The parent company, Profitak group, provides additional corporate backing. The company’s focus on automation and compliance with advertising platform rules positions it competitively in the e-commerce marketing technology space.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Cloudflare for bot and DDoS protection, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of up-to-date third-party analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with user privacy controls. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security documentation and improving HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update Drupal core and contributed modules to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities in Drupal 7.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Registration number
IČ 07139365
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Feed Image Editor is an online application for bulk enhancement of product images to increase e-shop sales. It allows adding colored frames, stripes, and texts to product images and automates image editing for advertising systems.
Key services
Bulk product image editing, Background removal, Resolution enhancement, Template creation with graphic elements, Campaign scheduling and export to advertising platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 2.2, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, CookieHub, Calendly widget, LightGallery, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of Cloudflare for bot management and DDoS protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Slovak language with multilingual options.
  3. Strong presence of cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and physical address.
  6. Use of multiple trusted third-party services for analytics and marketing.
  7. Drupal 7 CMS is somewhat outdated but still functional.
  8. Good branding consistency and trust signals from external review platforms.
  9. No critical security issues detected but security headers could be improved.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS, which is an older but stable platform. It uses jQuery 2.2 and Bootstrap for frontend UI components, along with several JavaScript libraries for carousel, lightbox, and analytics integration. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and CookieHub for cookie management. The presence of Calendly widget indicates integration with scheduling tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. However, Drupal 7’s aging codebase may pose technical debt and security risks if not actively maintained. The site lacks some modern security headers and formal documentation but overall technical implementation is solid for its scope.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feed-image-editor.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feed-image-editor.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.