Skip to main content

Security report for feed-image-editor.pl

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. · Technology · Poland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. operates the website feed-image-editor.pl, providing an online SaaS application focused on mass enhancement of product images for e-commerce businesses. The platform offers automated image editing features such as background removal, adding frames and text, and integration with advertising systems. The company positions itself as a niche technology provider within the e-commerce sector, offering a subscription-based model with a 30-day free trial. The website is professionally designed, localized in Polish, and includes multiple trust badges from reputable software review platforms, enhancing its credibility. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap and jQuery. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, and CookieHub for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though explicit security headers could be improved. Cookie consent is actively managed via CookieHub, indicating GDPR awareness. The security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers and the use of an older CMS version suggest areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or registry policies, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for a small technology SaaS company serving the e-commerce market. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, maintaining up-to-date CMS versions, and publishing a clear privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feed-image-editor.pl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. targets e-commerce businesses seeking to improve product image quality to increase sales. Their SaaS model with a fixed monthly fee independent of image volume simplifies pricing. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Mergado for distribution and Calendly for customer engagement. Trust badges from Capterra, SourceForge, and Software Advice indicate positive market reception. The company is part of the Profitak group, suggesting a broader corporate structure. The focus on automation and compliance with advertising platform requirements positions them competitively in the niche of e-commerce marketing tools. Growth potential lies in expanding integrations and enhancing automation capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed via CookieHub, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of Drupal 7, an older CMS version, may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small SaaS provider but could be improved with updated CMS, enhanced headers, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Upgrade Drupal CMS to the latest supported version and ensure all modules are regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Maintain and monitor cookie consent mechanisms and ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Registration number
07139365
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Feed Image Editor is an online application for mass improvement of product images in e-shops, allowing adding frames, text, background removal, and exporting to advertising systems.
Key services
Mass image editing, Background removal, Custom graphic templates, Integration with advertising platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 2.2, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieHub, Calendly widget
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Polish with good localization.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented via CookieHub.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to registry policies or privacy protection.
  5. Multiple trust badges and certifications are displayed enhancing credibility.
  6. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No contact phone numbers found, only email and physical address.
  9. No explicit privacy policy page found, only cookie consent dialog.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 7 CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery 2.2 for frontend UI. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, along with Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Cookie consent is managed by CookieHub, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph are well implemented. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but Cloudflare cookies suggest possible CDN or protection services. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feed-image-editor.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feed-image-editor.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.