Skip to main content

Security report for fee.global

Foundation for Environmental Education · Education · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Foundation for Environmental Education (FEE) is a well-established non-profit organization focused on environmental education and sustainable development with a global presence spanning over 100 member organizations in 83 countries. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on the Squarespace platform, featuring multiple educational programs and global partnerships. The technical infrastructure is modern and secure, with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, and integration of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp. Security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, although the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and terms of service page are areas for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates good content quality, clear navigation, and consistent branding, supporting the organization's credibility and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fee.global. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fee.global

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FEE operates in the education and non-profit sectors, delivering environmental education programs and sustainability certifications globally. Their business model relies on partnerships, member organizations, and educational campaigns. The website highlights strategic initiatives like GAIA 20:30 and collaborations with UN programs, indicating strong market positioning and growth potential. The presence of multiple social media channels and detailed program information supports engagement with a diverse audience including educators, students, and environmental stakeholders.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with HSTS, uses secure forms, and does not expose sensitive information. Security headers are present, and third-party scripts are limited to trusted services. However, the lack of a cookie consent mechanism may pose compliance risks under privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be enhanced to improve security transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to ensure compliance with privacy laws.
  2. Publish a clear terms of service page to define user and organizational responsibilities.
  3. Add an incident response contact or security page to improve transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and dependencies for security updates.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foundation for Environmental Education
Description
The Foundation for Environmental Education (FEE) is one of the world's largest environmental education organisations, with over 100 member organisations in 83 countries. They focus on environmental education and sustainable development through six main programmes including Eco-Schools, LEAF, YRE, Green Key, and Blue Flag.
Key services
Environmental education programmes, Sustainability certifications (Green Key, Blue Flag), Campaigns and partnerships, Conferences and events, Educational resources and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Tag Manager, Mailchimp, Typekit Fonts, jQuery, YUI Library
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Mailchimp tracking
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear navigation.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, common for non-profits.
  4. Strong presence of environmental education programs and global partnerships.
  5. No exposed security vulnerabilities or sensitive data found.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is missing despite cookie policy presence.
  7. No explicit terms of service page found.
  8. Multiple social media channels actively linked.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Squarespace).
  10. Good SSL and security header implementation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Typekit fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Mailchimp integration. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS with no major technical issues detected. Hosting is managed by Squarespace, providing reliable uptime and security features. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement advanced privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fee.global. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fee.global.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.