Skip to main content

Security report for fdg-entertainment.com

FDG Entertainment GmbH & Co. KG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FDG Entertainment GmbH & Co. KG is a Bavarian-based game development and publishing studio with a portfolio of over 70 games across mobile, PC, and console platforms. The company targets gamers and game developers, offering game production and publishing services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO and cookie management, and it employs Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency, which slightly impacts the overall trust score. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, but social media channels are actively linked. Security posture is good with HTTPS and spam protection, but lacks published security policies or incident response details. Overall, the website is well-structured and trustworthy for its business domain, but domain registration transparency should be improved.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fdg-entertainment.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FDG Entertainment holds a solid position in the gaming industry as a small-sized, specialized game studio and publisher. Founded in 2001, it has established a niche with a diverse game portfolio and merchandising offerings. The business model focuses on game creation and publishing, targeting a broad gamer audience and potential game developers seeking publishing partnerships. The company maintains active social media engagement, which supports marketing and community building. The website's professional design and content quality reflect a mature digital presence, although the lack of visible direct contact details may limit immediate customer engagement. The missing WHOIS data is a notable gap in transparency that could affect partner and customer confidence. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found, indicating an independent operation. The company appears to be focused on organic growth and brand consistency within the technology and media sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, ensuring encrypted communications. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on the contact form mitigates spam and automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via the Borlabs Cookie plugin, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for transparency and trust in security management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, while basic security best practices are followed, there is room for improvement in formalizing and publishing security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and customer support.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FDG Entertainment GmbH & Co. KG
Description
The bavarian games producing and publishing studio with <3
Key services
Game development, Game publishing, Merchandising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.0.11, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.6.0, Google reCAPTCHA, Borlabs Cookie plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and cookie management.
  3. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  4. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on site.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces domain trust.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.0.11, leveraging popular plugins like Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent management. It uses jQuery 3.6.0 and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is an opportunity to improve technical security by adding recommended HTTP headers and formalizing security documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with the business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fdg-entertainment.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fdg-entertainment.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.