Skip to main content

Security report for fb.com

Meta · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Facebook, operated by Meta, is a leading global social networking platform that enables users to connect, share content, and communicate. It holds a dominant market position with a broad user base and offers key services including social networking, messaging, video content, and advertising. The website is professionally designed with excellent user experience and strong branding consistency. Technically, Facebook employs modern web technologies such as React and extensive JavaScript frameworks, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security measures are robust, with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and secure cookie practices. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. Despite the absence of WHOIS data due to registry restrictions, the domain's legitimacy is supported by its global recognition and consistent branding.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fb.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 7 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fb.com

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
85
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fb.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12,498
Employees
618
Customers
6,703
Third parties
5,177
Weak passwords
26%

Latest record dated 2026-10-23 · 77 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fb.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fsoutpost.fb.com2026-10-23
  • –fsoutpost.fb.com2026-10-23
  • –fsoutpost.fb.com2026-10-23
  • –fsoutpost.fb.com2026-10-14
  • –fsoutpost.fb.com2026-10-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Facebook operates as a core asset of Meta, leveraging a business model centered on advertising revenue generated through extensive user engagement. Its market positioning as a technology giant is reinforced by its ownership of subsidiaries like Instagram, Messenger, and Threads. The platform targets a general audience worldwide, offering a suite of interconnected social media and communication services. Facebook's ecosystem includes partnerships and integrations with various marketing and analytics tools, enhancing its advertising capabilities. The company's strategic focus on user data monetization and platform expansion underpins its competitive advantage and growth trajectory.

Security posture

Facebook demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers such as HSTS and Content-Security-Policy, and secure cookie attributes. The site employs nonce-based script loading to mitigate cross-site scripting risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, public incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not directly available on the main site, suggesting an area for transparency improvement. Overall, Facebook maintains strong security best practices aligned with industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance public visibility of incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency.
  2. Maintain continuous monitoring and updating of third-party libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  3. Regularly audit privacy compliance to adapt to evolving regulations such as GDPR and NIS2.
  4. Increase user awareness and control over data collection and tracking mechanisms.
  5. Strengthen communication channels for security incidents and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meta
Description
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.
Key services
Social networking, Messaging, Video content, Advertising platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, JSON-LD, Open Graph
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web, Mobile (via alternate URLs)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of nonce in scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookie attributes (e.g., SameSite, Secure flags)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Analytics, Google Analytics (implied by Google tags)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
meta_pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Google Ads Conversions Tag, Google Recaptcha, PayPal OAuth API, Stripe
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms policies are present and linked in footer.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. Security best practices are implemented including HTTPS and security headers.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to registry privacy or restrictions.
  7. Multiple official Meta-related domains linked and referenced.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. High level of advertising and tracking technologies integrated.
  10. Excellent website design, navigation, and user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

Facebook's technical infrastructure is built on a modern tech stack including React, extensive JavaScript, and CSS frameworks. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness, with accessibility considerations evident. Use of JSON-LD structured data and Open Graph tags supports SEO and social media integration. The hosting environment and CDN usage are implied but not explicitly identified. Performance is fast with well-structured code and asynchronous script loading. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities for further modernization in transparency and incident response integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 94/100Low11 findingsView report
  2. 85/100 −3Low20 findingsView report
  3. 88/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.