Skip to main content

Security report for faraway.com

Faraway · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Faraway is a game studio specializing in the development and publishing of open economy games with blockchain and crypto integration. Their portfolio includes titles such as Dookey Dash: Unclogged, Serum City, Legends of the Mara, and Mini Royale: Nations. The company targets gamers interested in Web3 and blockchain gaming, positioning itself in a niche market focused on innovative game economies. The domain registration dating back to 2003 supports a long-standing presence in the industry, although the website content is currently inaccessible due to a client-side application error. Technically, the website employs modern technologies including Next.js and React, hosted behind Cloudflare with tracking integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Insights. However, the site lacks visible security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. The website's performance and mobile optimization are moderate to basic, with limited accessibility and SEO optimization. From a security perspective, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of contact information, and the presence of a client-side error reduce the site's trustworthiness and compliance posture. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the website itself requires remediation to restore full functionality and improve user trust. Overall, the website scores low to moderate on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, and privacy compliance, resulting in an overall AI score of 48. Strategic improvements in error resolution, policy publication, security headers, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance the site's credibility and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching faraway.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
95
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Faraway operates in the technology sector focusing on blockchain-based gaming, targeting a specialized audience of gamers and crypto enthusiasts. Their business model revolves around developing and publishing games with open economy features leveraging blockchain technology. The company appears to be small in size with a long domain history since 2003, suggesting established operations. The lack of visible partnerships or subsidiaries on the website limits insight into their broader ecosystem. The use of modern web technologies indicates a degree of digital maturity, but the current website error and missing compliance documentation suggest operational gaps. The company could benefit from enhancing transparency and security to strengthen market positioning and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security measures such as HTTPS and domain registration protections (clientDeleteProhibited, etc.). However, the lack of DNSSEC, absence of security headers, and missing published security policies indicate a low to moderate security maturity level. The client-side application error may expose internal error details, posing a potential risk. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting readiness for security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the client-side application error to restore full website functionality and prevent exposure of error details.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Faraway
Description
Faraway is a game studio that builds and publishes open economy games including Dookey Dash: Unclogged, Serum City, Legends of the Mara, Mini Royale: Nations, and more.
Key services
Game development, Game publishing, Open economy games, Blockchain and crypto integration
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare, Site24x7 RUM, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights, Site24x7 RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights, Site24x7 RUM
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website currently shows a client-side application error, limiting content accessibility
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content
  4. Uses modern web technologies such as Next.js and React
  5. Includes tracking scripts from Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Insights
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies published
  7. Domain registration is stable and consistent with a legitimate business
  8. Content is focused on blockchain gaming and open economy games
  9. No adult or explicit content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern JavaScript framework approach. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site includes Google Tag Manager and Site24x7 RUM for analytics and monitoring. Despite modern technology use, the site suffers from a critical client-side error preventing content display. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is minimally addressed with meta tags but lacks structured data beyond Open Graph. The absence of CMS suggests a custom or static site build. Technical debt is evident in error handling and missing security configurations, presenting risks to business continuity and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with faraway.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review faraway.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.