Skip to main content

Security report for fanmaker.com

FanMaker · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FanMaker is a technology company specializing in sports loyalty programs and fan engagement solutions. Their offerings include loyalty programs, mobile wallet and gift card solutions, benefit and discount programs, loaded ticket integrations, kids clubs management, fan photo engagement, and custom kiosks. The company targets sports teams and organizations across major leagues such as NFL, NHL, NBA, NCAA, and professional sports networks. The website reflects a mature business with over a decade of market presence and a strong portfolio of partner teams. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies, including JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, hosted and registered via Cloudflare. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security best practices like vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts are missing. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fanmaker.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FanMaker holds a strong market position as a leader in sports loyalty technology, serving a broad range of professional and collegiate sports teams. Their business model is B2B SaaS, focusing on increasing fan engagement and revenue through innovative digital solutions. The company leverages partnerships with major sports franchises and professional organizations, enhancing credibility and market reach. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for loyalty programs, transaction fees for mobile wallet payments, and custom solutions like kiosks and fan engagement tools. The target customer segments are sports teams, venues, and sponsors seeking to deepen fan loyalty and monetize fan interactions. Growth indicators include long-term client relationships and expansion into diverse sports sectors. The partnership ecosystem includes official team programs and sports networks, supporting a robust operational presence.

Security posture

FanMaker demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. The website lacks explicit security headers in the provided data, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are published, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could delay response to security incidents. Forms use CAPTCHA for spam prevention, and data submission is handled via secure POST requests. Tracking technologies are used responsibly, but cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting DNSSEC, publishing vulnerability disclosure policies, and improving privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FanMaker
Description
Innovative loyalty programs, digital payment solutions, mobile apps, and fan engagement tools designed to boost revenues and fan turn out.
Key services
Loyalty Programs, Mobile Wallet and Gift Cards, Benefit and Discounts Programs, Loaded Tickets Integration, Kids Clubs Management, Fan Photo Engagement (CrowdCameo), Custom Kiosks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS and Registrar
Frameworks
SmoothScroll.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare as registrar and DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on sports loyalty and fan engagement technology.
  3. Strong presence of testimonials from reputable sports organizations.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  6. Security policy page exists but lacks detailed framework references.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  8. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with moderate user tracking.
  9. Mobile optimized with good design and navigation clarity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses third-party analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, integrated via asynchronous scripts for performance. The SmoothScroll.js library is used for enhanced navigation experience. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure and security benefits. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and navigation clarity. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fanmaker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fanmaker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.