Skip to main content

Security report for falcocomputer.cz

K-System · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

K-System is a Czech Republic-based IT service provider specializing in tailored IT infrastructure solutions including network management, server solutions, cloud services, security, virtualization, backup systems, and point-of-sale systems. The company targets businesses seeking reliable and professional IT support and infrastructure. Their website demonstrates a solid digital presence built on WordPress with modern technologies and multiple analytics and tracking tools integrated. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and use of security plugins, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the professional presentation and client references support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and content-rich, catering effectively to its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching falcocomputer.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

K-System holds a stable market position as a regional IT service provider with a diverse portfolio of IT infrastructure services. Their business model focuses on full-service delivery from design to implementation and ongoing support, leveraging partnerships with hardware and software vendors like Hewlett Packard, Microsoft, and VMware. The company serves medium-sized businesses and organizations, emphasizing reliability and tailored solutions. Their marketing ecosystem includes an e-shop for hardware sales and active social media presence. Growth indicators include a broad service offering and client testimonials. Strategic observations suggest potential to enhance trust through improved transparency in privacy and security policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of anti-spam measures on forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating limited transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for business operations but would benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the website footer.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish security and incident response policies to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
K-System
Description
Postaráme se, aby vaše servery, software, cloud i hardware šlapaly jako po drátkách. Správa sítí a internet. Serverová řešení a zabezpečení.
Key services
Správa sítí a internet (Network and Internet Management), Serverová řešení (Server Solutions), Koncová zařízení (End User Devices), Zabezpečení (Security), Podpora a SLA (Support and SLA), Cloudová řešení (Cloud Solutions), Virtualizace (Virtualization), Zálohovací systémy (Backup Systems), Pokladní systémy (Cash Register Systems), Prodej a servis (Sales and Service)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts (Poppins), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, EcoMail (newsletter plugin), Contact Form 7, Honeypot plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security plugins (honeypot for forms)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
EcoMail newsletter, Contact Form 7
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional IT service provider site with comprehensive service descriptions.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form and social media links; no direct emails or phone numbers found in content.
  5. Use of multiple tracking and analytics services without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Good use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility features. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing approach but requires better privacy compliance. No hosting provider details were identified. Technical risks include missing security headers and partial privacy compliance, which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with falcocomputer.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review falcocomputer.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.