Skip to main content

Security report for fairtree.nl

Catch22.eu B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

27/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dropcatch.nl, operated by Catch22.eu B.V., provides a specialized service for rapid registration of .nl domain names that become available after a quarantine period. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking valuable domain names released from quarantine, offering a bidding and registration platform. The website is professionally designed with clear business information and contact details, supporting its niche market position in the Netherlands. Technically, the site uses established frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 3, jQuery, and Google Fonts, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks modern security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement, which are critical for protecting user data and enhancing trust. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no privacy or cookie policies present, and tracking is done via Google Analytics without visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration details align well with the business model, indicating legitimacy and consistency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fairtree.nl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
27

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Catch22.eu B.V. operates Dropcatch.nl as a focused service in the domain registration market, specifically targeting .nl domains released from quarantine. The business model relies on rapid registration technology and auctioning to maximize client success. The company maintains a clear contact and physical presence in the Netherlands, reinforcing trust. The partnership with SIDN.nl, the official .nl registry, strengthens its market position. The website content and structure support a professional image, though the absence of privacy and security policies may limit appeal to privacy-conscious clients. The use of older Bootstrap version suggests some technical debt but does not critically impair functionality. The company appears to be small but specialized, with a clear niche and steady client base.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no visible blocking or WAF mechanisms and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, and there is no explicit HTTPS enforcement visible in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. The use of Google Analytics without consent mechanisms further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires significant improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  3. Deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Catch22.eu B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Catch22.eu B.V.
Description
Catch22.eu B.V. specializes in rapid registration of .nl domain names that become available after quarantine, often on behalf of clients. They provide a service to quickly register valuable domain names as soon as they are released.
Key services
Rapid registration of .nl domain names after quarantine, Auctioning domain names when multiple clients are interested, Client registration and bidding platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3, jQuery, Popper.js, Google Fonts (Roboto), Font Awesome, DataTables
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS URLs in Open Graph tags
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a landing page for a domain recently registered by Dropcatch.nl
  2. Content is in Dutch and targets Dutch domain buyers
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found
  4. No forms present on this page
  5. Uses modern frontend libraries but Bootstrap version is 3 (older)
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking
  7. Contact information is clearly provided
  8. No explicit security headers or policies detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with Bootstrap 3, jQuery, Popper.js, and Font Awesome, indicating a stable but somewhat dated frontend framework. Google Fonts and DataTables are also used. The CMS appears to be UserSpice, which is a PHP-based user management system. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD. No modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced backend technologies are evident. The site lacks modern security features and accessibility enhancements, suggesting opportunities for modernization and technical debt reduction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fairtree.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fairtree.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.