Skip to main content

Security report for factori.ai

Factori.ai · Technology · Singapore

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 4 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Factori.ai is a technology company specializing in providing a real-world data layer for enterprise AI applications. Their platform offers enriched datasets and APIs that integrate external signals such as mobility, places, people, events, and economic data to enhance AI models for retail site selection, demand forecasting, marketing planning, and more. Positioned as a trusted partner for data teams and ML engineers, Factori.ai serves a global market with a focus on accuracy and explainability in AI forecasting. The company is relatively new, founded in 2022, and headquartered in Singapore. Their digital presence is professional, leveraging WordPress and Elementor with integrations for analytics and marketing tools.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching factori.ai

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention factori.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for factori.ai right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate factori.ai and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
45
Registered
45
Resolving
39
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-07-25

Masked preview

  • fa•••••.aiMediumbitsquatting
  • fa•••••.aiMediumbitsquatting
  • fa•••••.aiMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of factori.ai with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Factori.ai operates in the competitive AI and data enrichment sector, targeting enterprises requiring real-world contextual data to improve AI-driven decision-making. Their business model centers on API access and data product subscriptions, catering to industries such as retail, marketing, adtech, and martech. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through partnerships, customer testimonials, and presence on platforms like LinkedIn, Crunchbase, and G2. Their product suite covers a broad spectrum of data types, enabling diverse use cases from workforce optimization to supply chain management. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product catalog and active developer resources.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain-level protections such as EPP status locks. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and several recommended security headers are not explicitly detected. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure policy indicates room for improvement in privacy and security compliance. Analytics and tracking scripts are present, suggesting moderate user tracking. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header policies, explicit privacy controls, and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information to enhance trust and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Factori.ai
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Factori.ai
Description
Factori.ai is the Real-World Forecasting Layer for enterprises, converting external signals such as events, places, mobility, weather, traffic, economics, property, points of interest, people, and real-world graph data into model-ready features, enriched datasets, audience intelligence, and explainable forecasts for retail site selection, demand forecasting, marketing planning, adtech, and martech use cases.
Key services
Real-World Data Products, Forecast APIs, Data Enrichment, Audience Targeting, Enterprise AI Development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy Registrar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress with Elementor builder
  2. Strong focus on real-world data for enterprise AI
  3. Multiple product offerings with detailed descriptions
  4. Presence of customer testimonial indicating trust
  5. No explicit phone numbers found
  6. Contact primarily via email and contact forms
  7. No explicit cookie consent banner detected
  8. No visible terms of service page
  9. Privacy policy and trust center present and comprehensive
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Google Cloud DNS. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with factori.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review factori.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.