Skip to main content

Security report for facman.cz

Agionet s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FACMAN is a Czech Republic-based SaaS provider specializing in online inspection management software tailored for facility managers, inspection technicians, and companies managing multiple buildings and inspections. The platform offers features such as automated reminders, multi-building support, and PDF report generation, positioning itself as a niche player with a history rooted in facility management systems. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and provides clear pricing and demo options, indicating an active and customer-focused business model. Technically, the website is built on a PHP and Nette framework stack with MySQL backend, enhanced by Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The presence of reCAPTCHA on forms indicates basic security measures. However, the absence of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, supporting a good user experience. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no advanced security headers were detected. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, although the website content and contact information appear professional and consistent. No privacy policy or cookie consent banner was found, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing explicit privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, improving WHOIS transparency, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching facman.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FACMAN operates in the technology sector with a focus on facility and inspection management software. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized, flexible, and user-friendly online system that replaces traditional paper and Excel-based processes. The subscription-based pricing model with tiered plans targets small to medium-sized enterprises and technicians. The company maintains a partner ecosystem with related projects in reservation systems and voucher management, indicating diversified digital offerings. Growth potential exists through API integrations and customizations. The business emphasizes customer-centric development and responsiveness to user needs, positioning itself as a nimble alternative to large corporate systems.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. Use of HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA are positive indicators. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS weakens the defense against common web attacks. No evidence of a formal security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program was found. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trust and could be a risk factor. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent and explicit privacy policy pages. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small SaaS provider but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Ensure WHOIS domain registration data is complete and publicly accessible to enhance domain trustworthiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response contacts to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update SSL/TLS configurations and monitor for vulnerable libraries or outdated components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agionet s.r.o.
Description
FACMAN is an online web application designed for clear and simple management of inspections (revize). It is a tool for administration of all agendas related to inspections, suitable for building management, inspection technicians, and other companies.
Key services
Online inspection management, Automated notifications and reminders, Storage of inspection reports and photos, Multi-building and multi-user support, PDF generation of inspection reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, Nette Framework, MySQL, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA v2
Frameworks
Nette
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy page found, only terms and conditions PDF.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with named contact and company email.
  5. Pricing and demo environment are available, indicating active business operations.
  6. No social media links detected on the main page.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA indicates basic security and tracking.
  8. No advanced security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Website is in Czech language targeting Czech market.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom PHP application using the Nette framework and MySQL database, indicating a mature and stable technology stack. It leverages Google Fonts for typography and Google Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. However, the lack of detected CMS suggests custom development, which may require dedicated maintenance resources. Performance is moderate, with no explicit optimization indicators. The absence of advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms points to technical debt in security and privacy compliance. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance user privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with facman.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review facman.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.