Skip to main content

Security report for facebook.se

Meta · Technology · Sweden

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website is the Swedish localized login portal for Facebook, a leading social networking platform owned by Meta Platforms, Inc. It serves as a gateway for users in Sweden to access Facebook's services, including social networking, messaging, and video content. The site reflects Meta's strong market position as a global technology leader with a comprehensive suite of social media products. The business model centers on user engagement and advertising revenue, targeting a broad general audience. The website's content is professionally presented, with consistent branding and clear navigation tailored for Swedish users. From a technical perspective, the site employs modern web technologies such as React and BigPipe for efficient content delivery and dynamic user experience. The infrastructure is hosted on Meta's own robust platform, ensuring high performance and availability. The site is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices and fast loading times. Security posture is strong, with HTTPS enforced, secure login forms, and implied security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR adherence. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly visible on this page. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and aligned with industry best practices. The domain is a subdomain of facebook.com, a well-established and legitimate domain owned by Meta. No WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content access, allowing full analysis. Strategic recommendations include enhancing public visibility of security policies and incident response contacts to further strengthen user trust and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 7 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching facebook.se

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
85
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention facebook.se, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24
Employees
0
Customers
23
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
54%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for facebook.se.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Facebook operates as a dominant social media platform under Meta Platforms, Inc., targeting a global user base including Swedish-speaking users via localized portals. Its competitive advantage lies in its vast user network, integrated services (Instagram, Messenger, Threads), and advanced advertising ecosystem. Revenue streams primarily derive from advertising and data-driven marketing tools. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with various marketing and analytics providers. Growth indicators include continuous platform innovation and expansion into AI and augmented reality. The business model emphasizes user engagement and monetization through targeted ads, supported by extensive data collection and analytics capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure login mechanisms, and implied security headers such as HSTS. No direct exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was observed. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of publicly visible incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The site benefits from Meta's global security infrastructure but could enhance user trust by publishing explicit security frameworks and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention and user privacy controls.
  5. Maintain consistent branding and user experience across all localized domains.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meta
Description
Facebook hjälper dig att hålla kontakten med vänner och familj.
Key services
social networking, messaging, video content, advertising platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, BigPipe, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • secure login form
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Meta Analytics, Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Ads
Tracking pixels
Meta Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Adobe Marketo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is the Swedish localized login page for Facebook.
  2. Content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  3. Site uses modern web technologies and best practices.
  4. Strong branding and trust signals consistent with Meta Platforms.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the page.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  7. No security or incident response contact information found publicly.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No explicit adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including React and BigPipe for dynamic content loading and efficient rendering. It is hosted on Meta's proprietary infrastructure, ensuring high availability and performance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom-built platform. Performance is fast with asynchronous script loading and resource preloading. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring for library vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks is recommended to sustain operational excellence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with facebook.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review facebook.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.