Skip to main content

Security report for fabiao.com

四川博文网络科技有限责任公司 · Education · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

发表之家 operates as a specialized platform providing academic journal consultation and subscription services primarily targeting researchers, educators, and academic institutions in China. Established since 2010, it claims extensive partnerships with over 300 provincial and ministerial-level journal publishers, positioning itself as a significant player in the Chinese academic publishing support market. The website offers a broad catalog of journals across multiple disciplines, including education, medicine, economics, and technology, supported by a user-friendly interface and live customer support.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fabiao.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fabiao.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on facilitating journal subscriptions and providing consulting services related to academic publishing. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive journal database and partnerships, enabling it to serve a wide audience of academic professionals and institutions. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and consulting services. The presence of official business licenses and ICP备案 indicates regulatory compliance within China. The platform's ecosystem includes partnerships with educational and research-related websites, enhancing its market reach and credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and employs Baidu Analytics for user tracking. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, which may pose compliance risks under privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website's business licenses and contact information support its authenticity. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header policies and privacy compliance improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed privacy policy to improve compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response information to enhance transparency and user trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience across devices.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
四川博文网络科技有限责任公司
Registration number
91510922555779572Q
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
四川博文网络科技有限责任公司
Description
发表之家(fabiao.com)起始于2010年,具有多年期刊服务经验,主要从事期刊咨询、订阅等服务,目前已经获得300余家省级、部级期刊杂志社合作伙伴,是从事期刊咨询的网站。
Key services
期刊咨询, 杂志订阅, 投稿经验分享, 知识管理
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Baidu Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
Live chat scripts from jiain.net and soperson.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, raising domain legitimacy questions
  4. Business licenses and ICP备案 present indicating legal operation in China
  5. No privacy or cookie consent banners found
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  7. Multiple external links to educational and business partner sites
  8. Use of Baidu Analytics and live chat support scripts
  9. Content is academic and subscription focused, safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with jQuery libraries and Baidu Analytics integration. It uses external live chat scripts from third-party providers for customer support. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site is mobile-optimized with a clear and consistent design, though accessibility features are basic. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fabiao.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fabiao.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.