Skip to main content

Security report for ezodn.com

Ezoic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ezoic is a leading technology company specializing in data-driven ad monetization solutions for digital publishers and website owners. Their platform leverages first-party data and AI to optimize ad revenue, offering services such as ezID for identity management, video advertising, and intelligent ad management. The company holds notable partnerships with Google, Amazon, and Cloudflare, positioning itself as a trusted leader in the ad tech industry. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, and employs advanced analytics and consent management tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations, though the lack of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty in domain registration trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ezodn.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ezodn.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ezoic operates in the technology sector, focusing on ad monetization for digital publishers. Their business model centers on providing a SaaS platform that integrates first-party data with advertising networks to maximize revenue. The company targets website owners and advertisers seeking premium ad revenue solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in AI-driven optimization, direct advertiser connections, and comprehensive service offerings including video ads and analytics. The presence of strong partnerships and industry recognition supports their market position. Growth indicators include large network pageviews and increasing user engagement metrics. The ecosystem includes partner sites for login, support, and documentation, enhancing customer experience.

Security posture

Ezoic demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled, comprehensive security headers, and use of a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. No dedicated security contact channels were found. The company should consider publishing these to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with more explicit policies and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection officer contact and data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ezoic
Description
Ezoic provides the most complete ad monetization solution for websites. The leading provider of first-party data and identity protocol integration to ads; which enables sites to use audience lists to work more directly with advertisers.
Key services
Ad monetization platform, First-party data integration (ezID), Video advertising solutions, Ad management services, Cloud services, Analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Fathom Analytics, Post Affiliate Pro, Gatekeeper Consent CMP
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management platform for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Fathom Analytics, Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, Amazon Ads, Major Ad Networks (unspecified)
Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics, Post Affiliate Pro
Marketing tools
Gatekeeper Consent CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on first-party data-driven ad monetization technology.
  3. Multiple trusted partnerships and certifications displayed.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security incident response info found.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including React and Next.js frameworks, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and scalability. It integrates multiple analytics services such as Google Analytics, Fathom, and Vercel Analytics, alongside a consent management platform for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. The technical implementation reflects a mature and well-maintained digital presence with opportunities to improve security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ezodn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ezodn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.