Skip to main content

Security report for eyetechltd.com

Eyetech Ltd · Technology · Malta

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eyetech Ltd is a Malta-based IT services company established in 2002, offering a broad range of IT solutions including cloud services, IT support, security, and project services. The company holds Microsoft Gold Partner and ISO 9001 certifications, indicating a strong commitment to quality and technical expertise. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins and tools, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and spam protection, though improvements are needed in privacy and cookie policy transparency. Contact information is clearly presented, supporting business credibility. Overall, Eyetech Ltd appears to be a reputable and established IT service provider with a focus on dependable and tailored solutions for businesses.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eyetechltd.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eyetechltd.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
38
Employees
0
Customers
28
Third parties
10
Weak passwords
13%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eyetechltd.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eyetech Ltd positions itself as a trusted IT partner in Malta, targeting businesses of all sizes with managed IT services, cloud solutions, and cybersecurity offerings. Their partnerships with major technology providers and a recent collaboration with Fyorin for financial operations solutions highlight strategic growth and diversification. The company leverages a service-based business model with recurring revenue streams from managed services and support contracts. Their client retention and long-term relationships indicate strong market positioning and customer satisfaction. The website content and structure support their professional image and market focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses security plugins like Akismet to mitigate spam. However, there is a lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Security headers are not evident in the HTML content, and no advanced security frameworks are referenced. While no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the absence of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and security headers suggests room for improvement in compliance and defense-in-depth strategies. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or show blocking behavior, indicating normal accessibility.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and link a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including security contact emails.
  4. Review and minimize third-party scripts and ensure all are loaded securely to reduce attack surface.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve website security and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eyetech Ltd
Description
Eyetech Ltd provides IT services including cloud services, IT support, security services, and IT project services. They focus on dependable, personal, and cost-effective IT solutions to help businesses grow, with nearly 20 years of experience and Microsoft Gold Partner and ISO 9001 certifications.
Key services
Cloud Services, IT Support Services, Security Services, IT Project Services, Managed Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, Akismet, Chaty Pro, Advanced iFrame
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Akismet for spam protection)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (commented out), Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (Meta Pixel)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is business-focused with clear service offerings
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  4. Contact information is prominently available
  5. Use of multiple WordPress plugins and third-party scripts
  6. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and policies
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, and Akismet. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for typography and icons. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading for images. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from optimization and security hardening. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eyetechltd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eyetechltd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.