Skip to main content

Security report for eyejustread.com

EyeJustRead · Education · Denmark

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EyeJustRead is a Danish-based educational technology company specializing in data-driven reading development tools. Their award-winning SaaS platform leverages eye tracking and audio data to provide automatic analysis and feedback to support reading instruction for students, teachers, and educational consultants. The company collaborates with reputable educational institutions, publishers, and universities, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the education sector. The website is professionally designed, bilingual (Danish and English), and targets a broad audience including educators, parents, and students. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and Plausible Analytics for privacy-conscious tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures in place, but additional security headers and a published security policy would strengthen defenses. The WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or recent registration, which slightly reduces transparency but does not detract from the professional appearance and active partnerships. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, EyeJustRead presents a credible and trustworthy online presence with room for minor security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eyejustread.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
35
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EyeJustRead operates in the education technology sector, focusing on reading development through innovative eye tracking and audio data analysis. Their business model is SaaS, targeting schools, reading specialists, teachers, parents, and students. The company has established partnerships with major Danish educational publishers and universities, enhancing its market credibility. Revenue likely derives from subscriptions or licenses for their reading support software. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement and growth potential. The company is relatively small but well-positioned within its niche, emphasizing data-driven educational outcomes and personalized learning support.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse, and displays a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program. No signs of exposed credentials, malware, or phishing were found. The security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional headers, publishing security documentation, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EyeJustRead
Description
EyeJustRead er et værktøj som understøtter arbejdet med menneskers læseudvikling. Automatisk analyse af læsedata, accelererer arbejdet med læsning.
Key services
Eye tracking and audio data collection, Automatic reading data analysis, Feedback facilitation between teachers and students, Reading material planning, Holistic reading development support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slider Revolution, Plausible Analytics, YouTube iframe API
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Danish and English
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins
  4. Implements GDPR and cookie consent mechanisms
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities found
  6. WHOIS data missing, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
  7. Strong focus on educational reading development with eye tracking technology
  8. Multiple partner logos and social media links present
  9. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact form available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and WPBakery Page Builder for content layout. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused user tracking. The site uses Bootstrap for responsive design and includes multimedia content via YouTube iframe API. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a good user experience across devices. However, hosting provider details are not disclosed, and some security best practices could be further implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eyejustread.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eyejustread.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.