Skip to main content

Security report for extranet.pl

extranet Joanna Paździerska · Technology · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

extranet Joanna Paździerska is a Polish small business specializing in creating modern websites and digital solutions primarily for companies and public institutions. Their offerings include CMS-based website development, dedicated IT solutions, email hosting, and digital accessibility audits. The company positions itself as a niche provider with a focus on quality and client-specific customization. Technically, the website is built on a proprietary CMS (netadmin v7.32) and leverages common web technologies such as PHP, jQuery, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses Cloudflare Turnstile for spam protection, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the detailed contact information and professional presentation support legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid technical and business foundation with room for enhanced security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching extranet.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on web development and digital services for business and public sector clients. Its business model centers on service provision with a comprehensive approach including hosting and compliance audits. The presence of multiple contact points and a clear physical address indicates a stable operational structure. The use of a proprietary CMS suggests specialization and control over their technology stack. Market positioning appears local and specialized, with no evident large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries. The company maintains a moderate online marketing presence, primarily through Google Analytics tracking. Growth indicators or founding year are not disclosed, limiting deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and spam protection via Cloudflare Turnstile. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a security.txt file and incident response information suggests an opportunity to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Enhance monitoring and validation of form inputs to prevent injection and other web-based attacks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
extranet Joanna Paździerska
Registration number
871179250
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
extranet Joanna Paździerska
Description
Firma specjalizuje się w tworzeniu nowoczesnych serwisów internetowych, rozwiązań dla firm oraz jednostek publicznych, oferując kompleksową obsługę w zakresie CMS, poczty elektronicznej, audytów dostępności cyfrowej i rozwiązań dedykowanych.
Key services
CMS-based website creation, Dedicated solutions, Email hosting, Digital accessibility audits
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, jQuery, DataTables, Bootstrap Datetimepicker, Fancybox, Malihu Custom Scrollbar, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Spam protection via Cloudflare Turnstile
  • Session management with PHPSESSID

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie descriptions.
  3. Multiple contact channels with clear company information provided.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. No WHOIS data available for domain, limiting domain trust analysis.
  6. Use of Cloudflare Turnstile for spam protection indicates security awareness.
  7. Website uses a proprietary CMS (netadmin v7.32).
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. No advertising networks detected beyond Google Analytics tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a proprietary CMS (netadmin v7.32) built on PHP with client-side libraries including jQuery, DataTables, Fancybox, and Bootstrap datetimepicker. The site is served over HTTPS with good mobile optimization and accessibility features such as font size adjustments and high contrast modes. Performance is moderate, with some use of parallax effects and custom scrollbars that may impact load times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicit but appear to be self-managed. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with extranet.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review extranet.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.