Skip to main content

Security report for expoint.eu

"eXpoint" SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eXpoint SIA is a Latvian IT services company specializing in providing modern technological and innovative IT solutions for small and medium-sized businesses. Their offerings include website development, e-commerce platforms, hosting and server infrastructure, professional email services, and custom IT solutions built on their proprietary ICBM® platform. The company positions itself as a trusted IT guide for businesses embarking on digital transformation. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics with privacy-conscious configurations, and Google Maps integration. The site is mobile-optimized and features a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anonymized analytics, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, reflecting a mature digital presence for a small regional IT service provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching expoint.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eXpoint operates primarily in the Latvian market targeting SMEs needing IT infrastructure and digital services. Their business model revolves around service delivery including web development, hosting, email, and custom IT platforms. The company showcases a portfolio of client projects indicating active engagement and technical capability. Their competitive advantage lies in offering tailored IT solutions with a focus on digital transformation and business process automation. Revenue streams likely include project-based development fees, recurring hosting and email subscriptions, and custom solution development billed hourly. The company maintains a social media presence and provides clear contact and company registration information, enhancing credibility. Partnerships are client-based with several developed websites and platforms linked from their site. Growth indicators include diversified service offerings and a structured cookie consent mechanism reflecting regulatory awareness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with secure cookie flags and IP anonymization in analytics, indicating attention to data privacy. The cookie consent mechanism is granular and user-friendly, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of incidents. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting external reporting channels. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT service provider but could be improved with additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance with evolving regulations and best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
"eXpoint" SIA
VAT number
LV40203075921
Registration number
40203075921
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
"eXpoint" SIA
Description
eXpoint SIA - palīdzam uzņēmumiem risināt nepieciešamos ikdienas IT uzdevumus. Veikt pirmos soļus digitālizācijas vidē: mājas lapas, domēns, hosting, serveri, e-com, sistēmu izstrādē
Key services
Mājas lapas (Website development), Interneta veikals (E-commerce solutions), Hosting/serveri (Hosting and servers), Pro e-pasts (Professional email services), ICBM® platforma (Custom IT platform), IT risinājumi (Custom IT solutions)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics (gtag.js), Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Google Maps API, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Custom JavaScript for cookie consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS with Secure cookie flags
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent management with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with granular user controls.
  3. Clear business contact information and company registration details provided.
  4. Multiple project case studies demonstrate active business operations.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and Google Analytics with privacy considerations.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. No adult or questionable content present.
  9. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
  10. Website content primarily in Latvian with language switch options.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom PHP-based platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics with privacy-conscious settings and Google Maps for location display. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive layouts. The cookie consent system is custom-built with detailed user controls and local storage integration. The site lacks a known CMS, indicating bespoke development. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. Technical risks include missing security headers and reliance on multiple external scripts which require monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with expoint.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review expoint.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.