Skip to main content

Security report for exali.com

exali AG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

exali AG operates a professional indemnity insurance platform targeting freelancers, self-employed professionals, and companies across Europe, with a focus on digital professions such as IT, media, and consulting. The company offers modular insurance products accessible via an online real-time calculator, enabling quick and tailored insurance coverage. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides clear contact points including multiple customer care representatives, enhancing user trust and engagement. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and consent management tools, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations and a good user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, which slightly reduces transparency but is not uncommon for this business type. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good business credibility and moderate to strong security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exali.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

exali AG positions itself as a niche insurance provider specializing in professional indemnity for digital and traditional professions in Europe. Its business model leverages online direct sales with a real-time calculator, reducing friction for customers. The company targets freelancers and self-employed professionals, a growing market segment in the European gig economy. The presence of multiple country-specific domains indicates a localized market approach. Trust signals such as eKomi Gold Seal and detailed customer care contacts support credibility. The company appears small but focused, with a clear value proposition and a strong emphasis on customer service. Partnerships or sister sites for other countries enhance market reach. The lack of visible security policies and incident response info suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance communication.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates a consent management platform (Usercentrics), indicating compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. Google Tag Manager is used with ads data redaction enabled by default, reducing unnecessary data exposure. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and no dedicated security or incident response pages are publicly available. The absence of WHOIS transparency is a moderate concern but likely due to privacy protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Add publicly accessible incident response and abuse contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party JavaScript libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
exali AG
Description
exali.com offers comprehensive professional indemnity insurance solutions tailored for freelancers, self-employed individuals, and companies across Europe, focusing on digital professions such as IT, media, and consulting.
Key services
Professional Indemnity Insurance, Real-time insurance quote calculator, Modular insurance coverage, Customer care and claims support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
RequireJS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management, Featherlight Lightbox, Slick Slider, Bootstrap (modal), Stapes.js, LazySizes (lazy loading images)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • Ads data redaction enabled by default in Google Tag Manager

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong focus on professional indemnity insurance for freelancers and self-employed in Europe.
  3. Multiple country-specific subdomains and localized pages exist.
  4. Clear contact info with multiple customer care representatives listed with photos and emails.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and consent management tools.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, reducing transparency.
  8. Good SEO and metadata usage including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data.
  9. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modular JavaScript architecture with RequireJS and jQuery, combined with modern libraries like Featherlight for lightboxes and Slick Slider for carousels. Consent management is handled by Usercentrics, ensuring GDPR compliance. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing, with ads data redaction enabled. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and lazy loading images for performance. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional and user-friendly online insurance platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exali.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exali.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.