Skip to main content

Security report for evidence.com

Axon Enterprise, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Axon Enterprise, Inc. operates the evidence.com domain, providing technology solutions primarily for law enforcement and public safety agencies. The website content analyzed is a region selection interface, indicating a global or multi-regional service deployment. The company is an established enterprise with a domain registered since 1995, reflecting a mature market presence. The site uses modern web technologies including React and Material-UI, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure, ensuring a stable technical foundation. However, the content on this page is minimal, focusing on user input for region selection without extensive business or contact information. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or explicit policies, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms detected. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy linked but no cookie or terms of service policies evident. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evidence.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention evidence.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,719
Employees
0
Customers
1,702
Third parties
17
Weak passwords
10%

204 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for evidence.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Axon Enterprise is positioned as a technology provider in the law enforcement sector, offering digital evidence management and related services. The business model is B2B, targeting government and public safety agencies. The company benefits from a long domain history and consistent branding. The website's minimal content suggests a focus on secure, controlled access to services rather than marketing. No direct contact or incident response information is provided on this page, indicating that such details may reside elsewhere on the corporate site. The lack of visible analytics or tracking suggests a privacy-conscious approach or limited data collection on this interface.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved. The domain status flags clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, and clientUpdateProhibited indicate good domain management practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML. The absence of explicit security or incident response policies on this page limits transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but would benefit from enhanced security headers, DNSSEC, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  3. Publish detailed security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  4. Add cookie and terms of service policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including security contact channels, to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
Description
Axon Enterprise, Inc. provides technology solutions, likely focused on law enforcement and public safety, as indicated by the domain evidence.com and branding.
Key services
Digital evidence management, Law enforcement technology solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by JSX and component class names), Material-UI (Mui components), AWS DNS hosting, JavaScript ES6+
Frameworks
React, Material-UI
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a region selection page for Axon Enterprise's evidence.com domain.
  2. Content is minimal but functional, focused on selecting agency region.
  3. No direct contact information or detailed business info on this page.
  4. Privacy policy link is present in footer linking to axon.com trust page.
  5. No cookie or terms of service policies detected on this page.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  7. No social media or email contacts found in the HTML content.
  8. Site uses modern React and Material-UI frameworks.
  9. No security headers or explicit security policies visible in HTML.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with Material-UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, supported by the use of Amazon Registrar and AWS DNS servers. The site is responsive with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. However, no CMS or analytics platforms were detected, suggesting a custom or minimalistic implementation. Performance is moderate given the use of modern frameworks but could be improved with further optimization. The lack of SEO meta tags and structured data limits search engine visibility. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with better SEO, analytics, and security integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evidence.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evidence.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.