Skip to main content

Security report for eventilla.com

Eventilla Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eventilla Oy operates a Finnish-focused SaaS platform specializing in event management automation, including communication, ticket sales, and feedback collection. The company targets event organizers and businesses seeking streamlined event solutions, positioning itself as a niche player in the Nordic market. The website is professionally designed with multilingual support and integrates modern web technologies such as WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Despite the lack of WHOIS registration data, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with active social media channels and marketing tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CAPTCHA protections, though improvements in security headers and explicit privacy policies are recommended. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and business credibility but is slightly penalized for missing WHOIS data and privacy documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eventilla.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eventilla.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eventilla.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eventilla's business model revolves around providing SaaS event management tools, automating key event processes to enhance efficiency and branding consistency for clients. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers to optimize user engagement and conversion. Its market positioning is focused on Finnish and Nordic event markets, with a small company size and a founding year around 2020. The platform's integration with third-party services like Landbot.io and Elfsight widgets indicates a strategy to enhance user interaction and social proof. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for operational transparency improvement. The company maintains a consistent brand image and targets professional event organizers, which supports its credibility in the technology sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for enhancements in header implementation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to enhance usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eventilla Oy
Description
Automatisoi tapahtumanhallinta: tapahtuman viestintä, lipunmyynti ja palautteet Eventillalla, aina brändisi mukaisesti.
Key services
Event communication automation, Ticket sales, Feedback collection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, Instagram Feed plugin, Modal Window plugin, Elfsight widgets
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Landbot.io, Liana Technologies
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Landbot.io, Liana Technologies
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Finnish with English and Swedish alternatives.
  3. Strong use of cookie consent and privacy tools.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram confirmed.
  7. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. SSL is implemented with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA used for forms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. It integrates several third-party marketing and social media tools such as Landbot.io and Elfsight widgets, enhancing user engagement. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility is basic. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and resource optimization. The lack of detected hosting provider information suggests the need for further infrastructure transparency. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eventilla.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eventilla.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.