Skip to main content

Security report for eventible.com

Eventible · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eventible is a specialized online platform founded in 2020 that provides business professionals with trusted reviews and discovery tools for business events and conferences. The platform targets professionals seeking to maximize their event ROI by offering curated event information sorted by industry, priority, and event type. With over 60,000 monthly users, Eventible positions itself as a reliable source for event insights. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Next.js, React, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, and AdRoll, ensuring a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, implements cookie consent mechanisms, and uses security headers, but lacks publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy, though the professional presentation and structured data with founder information provide trust signals. Overall, Eventible presents a solid business and technical profile with room for improvement in transparency and security policy publication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eventible.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eventible operates in the technology sector, focusing on event review and discovery services for business professionals. Its business model revolves around providing curated event data and user-generated reviews to help users make informed decisions about attending or sponsoring events. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its targeted approach to business events, user testimonials from industry leaders, and integration of event tracking tools. Revenue streams likely include marketing partnerships, sponsored listings, and possibly premium features for event organizers. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and growth. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding industry-specific event coverage and enhancing user trust through transparency and security improvements.

Security posture

Eventible demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS, implementation of key security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR compliance. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing services is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. To elevate security maturity, Eventible should publish formal security and incident response policies, provide clear contact channels for security issues, and consider appointing or disclosing a Data Protection Officer. These steps would enhance compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2 and improve stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file.
  3. Disclose Data Protection Officer contact information to strengthen GDPR compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eventible
Description
Find the most worthwhile events for you! Search top rated events for your industry or role, sort based on your top priorities, and maximize your event ROI.
Key services
Business event reviews, Event discovery by industry and priority, Event ROI maximization tools, In-person event tracker
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics, AdRoll, Facebook Pixel, CookiePro Consent Management, Leadsy AI, Apollo.io Tracker, Ahrefs Analytics, Optimonk
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern analytics and tracking scripts with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs Analytics, Apollo.io Tracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Leadsy AI, Optimonk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting professionals seeking event reviews.
  3. Multiple professional testimonials and structured data enhance trust.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the content.
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Twitter confirmed.
  10. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, contributing to good SEO and performance. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, AdRoll, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature marketing technology stack. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with preloading of critical CSS and scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience with opportunities for further optimization in accessibility and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eventible.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eventible.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.