Skip to main content

Security report for eventengine.tv

Event Engine CMS Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Event Engine CMS Ltd is a specialized web development company focused on delivering custom web applications and software solutions for the events industry. Founded in 2016 and based in Great Britain, the company offers a range of products including a CMS platform (Rondayvoo CMS), live streaming and networking solutions (Rondayvoo Live), and AI-powered content assistants (Rondayvoo AI). Their market position is that of a niche provider trusted by notable event brands and professional conference organizers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and clear service offerings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks such as the Bricks theme builder and The SEO Framework plugin. It employs standard web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Hosting appears to be via NameCheap, consistent with the registrar information. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protections enabled. However, the contact form's Google reCAPTCHA implementation is broken due to an invalid site key, which poses a risk of spam. Additionally, security headers are not detected, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility and technical maturity with minor security and compliance gaps. Strategic improvements in security controls and transparency would enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eventengine.tv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eventengine.tv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eventengine.tv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Event Engine operates in the event technology sector, providing tailored web applications and software solutions to event organizers and professional conference organizers. Their business model combines service delivery with proprietary product offerings under the Rondayvoo brand. Revenue streams likely include website development fees, subscription fees for additional websites, and licensing for their CMS and live streaming platforms. The company leverages partnerships with design agencies and integrates with multiple event tech stacks, enhancing their competitive advantage. Their client base includes established event brands, indicating a stable market presence. The company emphasizes ongoing support and expertise, positioning itself as a trusted partner in event technology solutions.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration protections are in place. However, the invalid Google reCAPTCHA site key on the contact form is a notable vulnerability that could lead to spam or abuse. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small technology service provider but could be improved with better form protection, security headers, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Fix the Google reCAPTCHA site key on the contact form to prevent spam and abuse.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish an incident response policy or security page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Event Engine CMS Ltd
Description
A team of web developers specializing in event technology, delivering WordPress websites, virtual venues, system integrations, AI solutions, and custom software for events.
Key services
Custom web applications for events, CMS solutions (Rondayvoo CMS), Live streaming and networking platforms (Rondayvoo Live), AI-powered content assistants (Rondayvoo AI), Event website templates and tailored design, Support and consultancy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Splide.js (carousel), Google Analytics, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
The SEO Framework (WordPress plugin), Bricks (WordPress theme builder)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented (though site key invalid)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visitor Queue
Marketing tools
Visitor Queue
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on event technology and custom software solutions
  3. Multiple integrations and product offerings under Rondayvoo brand
  4. Contact form present but reCAPTCHA site key invalid, posing spam risk
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond privacy and cookie policies
  6. No terms of service or incident response information found
  7. Social media presence on major platforms
  8. Use of modern WordPress theme builder and SEO framework
  9. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Bricks theme builder and The SEO Framework plugin, indicating a focus on SEO and performance. JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Splide.js are used for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics tracking. The site is mobile responsive and uses lazy loading for images and videos to optimize performance. Hosting is inferred to be via NameCheap, consistent with the registrar DNS servers. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Minor technical debt is noted in the invalid reCAPTCHA implementation and lack of security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eventengine.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eventengine.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.