Skip to main content

Security report for evenium.events

EVENIUM · Technology · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EVENIUM is a French company specializing in event management solutions, targeting event organizers and corporate clients. The company has been established since 2014 and operates primarily in the technology sector focused on event software and services. The website content is minimal and primarily JavaScript-driven, with no visible textual content or metadata to provide detailed information about the business or its offerings. The technical infrastructure appears modern with usage of ES modules and hosting on AWS, but lacks visible SEO, accessibility, and performance indicators. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers, DNSSEC, and visible privacy or cookie policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and user trust. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business credibility despite the minimal web presence. Overall, the website requires significant improvements in content, security, and compliance to better serve its audience and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evenium.events

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate evenium.events and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
37
Registered
37
Resolving
37
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • xn••••••••••••••••.eventsLowhomoglyph
  • xn••••••••••••••••.eventsLowhomoglyph
  • xn••••••••••••••••.eventsLowhomoglyph

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of evenium.events with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EVENIUM operates in the event management technology sector with a B2B business model. The company targets event organizers and corporate clients, offering event management software and engagement tools. The domain age and registrant information align with an established business in France. However, the website lacks visible business details, contact information, and trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. The company appears to have moderate branding consistency but poor content quality on the website. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The minimal digital footprint suggests potential underinvestment in online presence or a focus on other channels for customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents. The website uses HTTPS, but no further SSL configuration details are available. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the limited content. Overall, the security maturity level is low, and the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the website to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Enhance website content quality and metadata to improve SEO, user experience, and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EVENIUM
Description
EVENIUM provides event management solutions and services, targeting event organizers and professionals.
Key services
event management software, event engagement tools, event analytics
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and mostly JavaScript-driven with no visible textual content or metadata.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  3. No contact information or forms detected in the HTML content.
  4. External scripts and domains are primarily related to the company’s own domains and AWS hosting.
  5. No social media links or emails found in the provided HTML content.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected from the data provided.
  7. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate business entity in France.
  8. Website lacks SEO and accessibility features based on minimal HTML content.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content safety rating is safe.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript ES modules and is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, as indicated by the DNS servers. However, the HTML content is minimal with no visible metadata, forms, or textual content, which negatively impacts SEO and accessibility. No CMS or frameworks are detected from the provided data. The site lacks visible performance optimization indicators and accessibility features. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information suggests technical debt in compliance and security implementation. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, but DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a technical security gap. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and requires improvements to meet modern web standards and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evenium.events. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evenium.events.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.