Skip to main content

Security report for evbuc.com

Eventbrite · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eventbrite is a leading global event management and ticketing platform that enables users to discover, create, and promote a wide variety of events including concerts, workshops, festivals, and more. The platform serves event organizers, attendees, and businesses with a comprehensive suite of tools for ticketing, marketing, and event management. Eventbrite holds a strong market position as a trusted and widely used service in the event technology sector. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as React, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Analytics, and employs a robust consent management system to comply with privacy regulations. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, Eventbrite enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and manages user consent effectively. While no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests areas for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, Eventbrite presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility, technical sophistication, and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and enhancing accessibility features to maintain leadership in security and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of evbuc.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evbuc.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eventbrite operates as a platform-as-a-service business model, generating revenue primarily through ticket fees and premium event management services. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive global reach, comprehensive feature set, and strong brand recognition. The company targets event organizers ranging from individuals to large enterprises, as well as attendees seeking diverse event experiences. Partnerships with major advertising and analytics providers enhance its marketing capabilities. Growth indicators include continuous feature expansion and integration with mobile platforms. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and active social media engagement.

Security posture

Eventbrite demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and consent management aligned with GDPR requirements. The site avoids exposing sensitive information and integrates third-party tracking responsibly with user consent. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. Compliance with privacy laws is evident, but formalizing vulnerability disclosure and incident response processes would strengthen security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page accessible from the website footer.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Eventbrite, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eventbrite
Description
Eventbrite is a global event management and ticketing platform that allows users to discover, create, and promote local events such as concerts, workshops, festivals, and more.
Key services
Event ticketing, Event marketing platform, Eventbrite Ads, Payment processing, Event management software, Mobile ticketing apps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Branch.io, Transcend Consent Management, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for cookies and tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
Branch.io, Eventbrite Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management
  4. No WHOIS data available indicating privacy protection
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy page found
  6. Multiple social media and contact channels provided
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with extensive use of asynchronous JavaScript and CSS chunking for performance optimization. Integration with multiple analytics and marketing platforms indicates a sophisticated data collection and user engagement strategy. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but performance and uptime appear robust. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +15Low22 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evbuc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evbuc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.