Skip to main content

Security report for evalanche.services

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Evalanche.services operates as a status monitoring website primarily focused on providing real-time system status updates and announcements related to its email and web services. The site lists multiple instances and mail servers with performance indicators, targeting existing customers and users of Evalanche's platform. The content is technical and operational, with no commercial or marketing content visible. The website is in German and serves as a communication channel for maintenance and outage notifications. From a technical perspective, the website is simple, built with basic HTML and CSS, and lacks advanced frameworks or CMS. It shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks SEO and accessibility enhancements. No external scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies were detected, indicating minimal data collection and user tracking. Security posture is limited based on the available data. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, which impacts compliance and trust. The WHOIS data is minimal and privacy-protected, which is common but reduces transparency. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting user support options. Overall, the website serves its purpose as a status page but lacks comprehensive security, privacy, and business credibility features. Strategic improvements in security headers, HTTPS enforcement, privacy policies, and contact information would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evalanche.services

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Evalanche.services appears to be a niche service status portal for the Evalanche platform, which likely provides email marketing or web services. The business model focuses on operational transparency and customer communication regarding system availability. The lack of marketing or sales content suggests this is a support-facing site rather than a primary business front. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries linked from this domain. The site targets existing customers needing status updates, indicating a B2B or SaaS support function. The absence of detailed company information or certifications limits assessment of market positioning or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security maturity of evalanche.services is low based on the available data. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes users to potential risks such as data interception or clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The lack of incident response contact channels or security policies reduces the ability to handle security events effectively. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content, but the minimal security controls and lack of transparency represent a moderate risk to users and the business. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy policies, and enabling HTTPS are critical next steps.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and support channels.
  5. Improve website accessibility and SEO to enhance user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Evalanche provides a status monitoring service for its systems including mail servers, web instances, and other services. The website focuses on system status updates and announcements related to maintenance and outages.
Key services
System status monitoring, Mail server performance and availability, Web login and performance monitoring, Other service status (Campaign Designer, Reporting API, SOAP)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website serves as a status monitoring portal for Evalanche services.
  2. Content is primarily in German language.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  5. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  6. No external links or partner domains referenced.
  7. No security headers or advanced security features detected in provided data.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal and privacy-protected, limiting registrant transparency.
  9. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  10. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS. The site structure is simple and focused on status display with multiple system components listed. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization evident. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits business intelligence. The lack of security headers and HTTPS enforcement is a technical risk. The site could benefit from modernization including responsive design frameworks, SEO meta tags, and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evalanche.services. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evalanche.services.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.