Skip to main content

Security report for eurodk.com

Getic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Getic is a medium-sized IT company specializing in the distribution of wired and wireless network equipment including routers, antennas, switches, and security devices. The company positions itself as a fast-growing distributor with a global reach, shipping to over 150 countries. The website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and integrates third-party services such as Trustpilot for reviews and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is partial with a cookie banner but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Contact information is not explicitly provided, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the website demonstrates a functional and professional digital presence but requires improvements in transparency, security, and compliance to enhance trust and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eurodk.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a distributor in the technology sector, targeting IT companies and network equipment buyers worldwide. Its business model focuses on supplying a broad range of networking hardware and related products. The presence of Trustpilot widgets suggests an emphasis on customer trust and reputation management. The lack of detailed company registration and contact information online may indicate a need for better corporate transparency. The global shipping capability indicates a scalable logistics operation. The company’s growth trajectory appears positive but would benefit from clearer regulatory and compliance disclosures.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The absence of WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and may pose risks related to ownership disputes or domain hijacking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available to improve legitimacy and trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Getic
Description
Getic is one of the fast growing IT companies. Company is network equipment distributor that sells a large variety of wired and wireless devices: routers, antennas, switches, cables, security and monitoring equipment. Orders are shipped to more than 150 countries all over the world.
Key services
Distribution of wired and wireless network devices, Sales of routers, antennas, switches, cables, Security and monitoring equipment sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot, Trustpilot widgets, Google Tag Manager, Tawk.to chat widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Trustpilot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot consent management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks and third-party integrations like Cookiebot for consent management, Trustpilot for reviews, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Tawk.to for live chat support. The site is mobile responsive and uses custom fonts and icons for branding consistency. Performance appears moderate with preloading of fonts and images. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and canonical URLs. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eurodk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eurodk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.