Skip to main content

Security report for eunity-service.de

eunity GmbH · Technology · Germany

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eunity GmbH is a small German technology company specializing in the development and hosting of databases, database applications, and functional web portals. Their website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their services, including database development, data migration, web portal creation, CMS setup, and hosting. The company targets business customers requiring tailored software solutions and maintains a portfolio of projects demonstrating their capabilities. Technically, the website uses a modern stack with Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, offering good mobile responsiveness and user experience. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance and security best practices. No incident response or security policies are published, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eunity-service.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche technology sector focused on custom database and web application development. Their business model is service-oriented, providing development and hosting solutions primarily to German clients. The presence of multiple project references and a customer login portal indicates ongoing client engagement and operational maturity. The company appears to have a stable market position within its niche, with no indications of large scale or enterprise operations. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company leverages partnerships or related projects with domains such as solidarpass.de and impfgelegenheit.de, indicating involvement in social and community-oriented digital solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. HTTPS usage is assumed but not confirmed due to lack of SSL data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. Forms use POST methods, reducing risk of data exposure, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a GDPR compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and adding cookie consent.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify it is active site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eunity GmbH
Description
Die eunity GmbH entwickelt und hostet Datenbanken, Datenbankanwendungen und Funktions-Webportale.
Key services
Datenbankentwicklung, Datenbankanwendungen, Migration von Datenbeständen, Web-Portale Entwicklung, Web-Content-Management-Systeme Einrichtung, Web-Hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 5, jQuery 3.7.1, Popper.js, FontAwesome 5.10.2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets business customers for database and web application services.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers and email.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Technical stack is modern but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. Multiple project references and customer login portal indicate active business operations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, jQuery 3.7.1 for scripting, Popper.js for UI elements, and FontAwesome for icons. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for author and description, supporting SEO basics. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Hosting appears to be managed via domaincontrol.com DNS, likely GoDaddy, but no direct hosting provider info is available. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eunity-service.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eunity-service.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.