Skip to main content

Security report for eudonet.fr

Eudonet · Technology · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eudonet is a technology company specializing in CRM software solutions, targeting subscribers and clients primarily in France with additional presence in Canada and the UK. The website analyzed is a secure login portal for Eudonet CRM subscribers, offering multi-language support and user authentication features. The business model centers on SaaS CRM services with a focus on client account management. Technically, the site runs on Microsoft IIS with ASP.NET and uses XHTML transitional markup. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not serve content over HTTPS, which is a critical security deficiency. Security headers are partially implemented, but the absence of TLS protocols and certificate transparency compliance significantly weakens the security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are not present, and no contact or business information is provided on this login page, limiting transparency and compliance indicators. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate business credibility and good content quality but suffers from poor security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eudonet.fr

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eudonet holds an established position in the CRM market with regional sites for France, Canada, and the UK, indicating a multi-national footprint. The company targets business clients requiring CRM solutions with secure subscriber access. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, focusing on CRM software delivery. The lack of visible privacy and security policies on the login page suggests potential compliance gaps. The absence of contact information on this page limits direct customer engagement but may be available elsewhere on the main corporate sites. The technology stack is traditional Microsoft-based, which may require modernization to improve security and performance. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a professional web presence across its domains.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. While some security headers like HSTS and X-XSS-Protection are present, the lack of modern TLS support and OCSP stapling reduces overall security effectiveness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security certifications are mentioned. The login forms handle sensitive credentials but without enforced HTTPS, posing a significant risk. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration and publication of privacy and security policies are recommended to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add contact information and security incident response channels on the website.
  5. Implement security.txt and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Microsoft IIS 8.5 with ASP.NET 4.0, using XHTML 1.0 Transitional markup and custom JavaScript and CSS files. The site lacks modern performance optimizations and mobile responsiveness is basic. No CMS or third-party analytics/tracking scripts are detected. DNS is managed via Gandi.net with SPF records configured for Outlook mail protection. The SSL configuration is absent, resulting in no HTTPS support. Security headers are partially implemented but insufficient without SSL. The site’s performance metrics are not available, indicating potential slow loading. The technology stack is stable but dated, with opportunities for modernization and improved security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eudonet.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eudonet.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.