Skip to main content

Security report for eip.eu.com

EIP Limited · Technology · United Kingdom

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EIP Limited is a UK-headquartered company established in 2004, specializing in embedded insurance software solutions. They provide a comprehensive suite of products including a back-office platform (EIP Core), a customer self-service web portal (EIP Web), and a mobile app (EIP App) to enable insurers, brokers, telcos, banks, and retailers to offer embedded insurance programs efficiently. The company positions itself as an industry leader with deployments across multiple countries and millions of policies managed. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Microsoft Clarity, all managed with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and privacy policies published, though there is room for improvement in explicit security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eip.eu.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
55
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eip.eu.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
56,934
Employees
76
Customers
53,963
Third parties
2,895
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-07-05 · 1,492 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eip.eu.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ru.hrmaps.eu.com2026-07-05
  • –webmail.eti.eu.com2026-06-20
  • –fr.hrmaps.eu.com2026-06-18
  • –ca.hrmaps.eu.com2026-06-17
  • –webmail.eti.eu.com2026-06-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate eip.eu.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
2
Registered
2
Resolving
2
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-27

Masked preview

  • eu•••.com.comLowvarious
  • eu•••.comeu.comLowvarious

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of eip.eu.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EIP operates in the technology and finance sectors, focusing on embedded insurance solutions delivered via SaaS platforms. Their business model targets B2B clients such as insurers, telcos, and banks, offering scalable and API-enabled software products. The company has a medium-sized footprint with a history dating back to 2004, indicating stability and experience. Their marketing strategy leverages case studies, social media, and multi-language localized domains to expand reach. The partnership ecosystem includes localized subdomains for Korean and Spanish markets. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, implementation services, and ongoing support. Growth indicators include multiple client success stories and a broad product portfolio. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital transformation in insurance distribution and customer experience enhancement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Privacy and information security policies are publicly available, indicating compliance awareness. However, the absence of a security.txt file and explicit incident response contact information represents a gap in vulnerability disclosure and incident management transparency. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, which could be improved to mitigate common web attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security flaws were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  2. Implement and enforce additional security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels on the website, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EIP Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EIP Limited
Description
EIP is the industry-leading Embedded Insurance solutions provider for insurers, brokers, telcos, banks, retailers, telcos and others. They provide software platforms for embedded insurance programs including back-office, web portal, and mobile app solutions.
Key services
EIP Core - back-office insurance platform, EIP Web - self-service web portal for policy management and claims, EIP App - mobile app for buying insurance, managing policies, and claims
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Videojs HTML5 Player, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, jQuery, SiteGround Optimizer, Jarallax (parallax and video backgrounds), LazySizes (lazy loading images), Bing Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
HubSpot CRM and marketing tools
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with consent management
  • Privacy policy and information security statement published
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and HubSpot with consent sync

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Quora Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot CRM and marketing automation
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management
  3. Multiple embedded videos using Videojs player
  4. Strong use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich snippets
  5. Active social media presence linked in footer and header
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security issues in HTML
  7. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure contacts found
  8. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with consent synchronization
  9. Clear business focus on embedded insurance software solutions
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder, with a modern tech stack including Videojs for video playback, HubSpot for marketing automation, and Google Tag Manager for tag management. Hosting appears to be provided by SiteGround, inferred from plugin usage and asset URLs. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images and videos. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile-specific headers. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags, including Open Graph and Twitter Cards. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site integrates multiple analytics and advertising platforms, requiring careful consent management which is implemented via a cookie banner and consent sync with HubSpot and Google. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eip.eu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eip.eu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.