Skip to main content

Security report for etracker.com

etracker GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

etracker GmbH operates as a European privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics, offering comprehensive web analytics, tag management, and consent management solutions tailored for businesses and marketers prioritizing data protection and GDPR compliance. Their platform emphasizes data quality without loss, even under strict privacy regulations, positioning them strongly in the European market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with rich content, customer testimonials, and clear navigation, targeting professional users seeking privacy-compliant analytics tools. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates Cloudflare DNS services, but suffers from a critical security flaw due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate, which undermines trust and security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with explicit cookie and privacy policies and a consent management system. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility and privacy focus but requires urgent remediation of SSL issues to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of etracker.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching etracker.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
75
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

etracker GmbH holds a competitive position as a privacy-first analytics provider in the European market, leveraging GDPR-compliant technologies and offering a SaaS model with modular services including analytics, tag management, and consulting. Their business model targets medium-sized enterprises and agencies requiring reliable, consent-free tracking solutions. The company maintains partnerships with various clients and agencies, as evidenced by testimonials and linked partner domains. Their marketing emphasizes data quality, legal compliance, and ease of integration, supported by educational resources like webinars and an academy. The absence of explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests an area for improvement in transparency and security governance.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of HTTPS enforcement, and missing security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and others. While no known SSL vulnerabilities or outdated protocols were detected, the lack of modern TLS support and OCSP stapling reduces the security level. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt file is present. Forms are protected with CAPTCHA and validation, but overall, the site requires immediate SSL remediation and implementation of security best practices to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure communications.
  2. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and WPForms plugins, indicating a modern and extensible platform. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and nameservers, enhancing DNS performance and reliability. The site loads moderately fast with a page size of approximately 351 KB and 68 resources. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and ARIA attributes. However, the SSL configuration is incomplete or invalid, and no modern TLS protocols are enabled, which is a significant technical risk. The site uses JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and lodash, and integrates etracker's own tracking and consent management scripts. Overall, the technical stack is solid but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 84/100 +1Low24 findingsView report
  3. 83/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with etracker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review etracker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.