Skip to main content

Security report for etracker.com

etracker · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

etracker is a German-based technology company providing a privacy-focused web analytics platform positioned as a European alternative to Google Analytics. Their services include web analytics, tag management, consent management, and data warehouse synchronization, targeting marketers and businesses seeking GDPR-compliant analytics solutions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, emphasizing data privacy and compliance with European data protection laws. Technically, the site uses WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes fraud detection and consent management scripts, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business indicators suggest legitimacy. Overall, etracker presents a trustworthy and professional analytics service with a strong privacy compliance focus.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of etracker.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching etracker.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
73
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

etracker holds a solid market position as a privacy-compliant analytics provider in Europe, differentiating itself from Google Analytics by offering cookieless tracking and consent-free data collection under GDPR and TDDDG guidelines. Their business model is SaaS-based, serving medium-sized enterprises and marketers who prioritize data protection. The company supports its customers with consulting and training services, enhancing customer retention and value. The presence of customer testimonials and certifications strengthens their credibility. The ecosystem includes partners and clients from various sectors, indicating a broad market reach. However, the lack of visible WHOIS registrant data is a potential risk factor for trust and should be addressed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and integrated consent management aligned with GDPR. The inclusion of fraud detection scripts indicates proactive risk management. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. To improve, etracker should publish explicit security and incident response information and consider a vulnerability disclosure channel to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Disclose Data Protection Officer contact details to comply with GDPR transparency requirements.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
etracker
Description
etracker analytics ist die europäische Alternative zu Google Analytics für erfolgreiches & rechtskonformes Onlinemarketing ohne Datenverlust.
Key services
Web analytics, Tag Manager, Consent Manager, BI & Data Warehouse Sync, Consulting, Academy training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPML, etracker analytics scripts, Fraud0 fraud detection, Signalize
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • Fraud detection scripts included
  • Cookie blocking and consent banners

Analytics and tracking

Services
etracker analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fraud0, Signalize, etracker analytics
Marketing tools
etracker Tag Manager, etracker Consent Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on privacy and GDPR compliance
  3. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS
  4. Includes consent management and cookieless tracking
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. Multiple customer testimonials and certifications enhance trust
  8. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  9. Contact form available on dedicated contact page
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern front-end technologies including JavaScript and CSS optimizations. It uses Yoast SEO and WPML for SEO and multilingual support, indicating good digital maturity. Performance is optimized with preloading of critical assets and responsive images. The site includes advanced tracking and consent management scripts from etracker and third-party fraud detection services. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but HTTPS and security headers indicate a secure hosting environment. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience with room for improvement in security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100 +1Low24 findingsView report
  2. 83/100 +17Low24 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with etracker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review etracker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.