Skip to main content

Security report for eth.limo

Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0167022659 · Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eth.limo is a technology service focused on making decentralized websites accessible, specifically those built with the Ethereum Name Service (ENS). The website positions itself as a niche service provider facilitating effortless access to blockchain-based web content. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2021, with domain registration protected by privacy services. The site uses modern front-end technology (Framer) and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, but DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policies are published. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eth.limo

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets users interested in decentralized web technologies and Ethereum blockchain services. Its competitive advantage lies in simplifying access to ENS-based content, a growing segment in the blockchain ecosystem. Revenue streams and detailed business model are not explicitly disclosed, but the presence of documentation and blog partnerships indicates a content-driven engagement strategy. The company leverages partnerships with GitBook for documentation and Substack for blogging, enhancing its ecosystem presence. Growth indicators include a domain age of 3 years and consistent branding. The use of privacy protection for domain registration is typical for small tech startups. Strategic observations suggest the company is focused on technology innovation within blockchain accessibility but should improve transparency and compliance to build trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized changes, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces domain security against DNS spoofing. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no published security or incident response policies exist. There is no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site uses minimal tracking via Framer events but lacks clear data retention or user privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small tech service but requires improvements in domain security, policy publication, and compliance to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing incident response contact channels and data protection officer information if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0167022659
Description
Making decentralized websites accessible again · Everything you need to effortlessly access content built with the Ethereum Name Service.
Key services
Access to decentralized websites, Ethereum Name Service content access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, JavaScript, Google Fonts, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Framer Events
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
events.framer.com
Marketing tools
Substack (blog), GitBook (documentation)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the site
  3. Contact email provided with company domain
  4. Site uses modern front-end framework (Framer) and is hosted on AWS DNS infrastructure
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. Content is focused on Ethereum Name Service and decentralized web access
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer framework, leveraging modern JavaScript and hosted on AWS DNS infrastructure. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses SVG graphics for branding. Performance is moderate with module preloading and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design breakpoints defined. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, though no JSON-LD structured data was detected. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. No CMS other than Framer was detected. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business scope but could benefit from additional security and compliance tooling integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eth.limo. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eth.limo.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.