Skip to main content

Security report for etarget.eu

Etarget se · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Etarget se is a digital advertising service provider specializing in programmatic and display advertising solutions. Their business focuses on optimizing campaigns for attention, engagement, and conversions through data-driven approaches. The company targets media agencies, publishers, and brands, positioning itself as a specialized partner with long-term client relationships and expertise in campaign optimization. The website content is professional and consistent with their market positioning. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Google Tag Manager, jQuery, and Swiper.js, along with cookie consent management scripts. The site is mobile optimized with good design quality and clear navigation. However, some technical improvements could be made in accessibility and SEO optimization. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and no public security or incident response policies are available, indicating room for improvement in security transparency. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible advanced security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Business credibility is supported by client testimonials and trust signals such as IAB membership. WHOIS data is privacy protected by EURid, which is common and justified for this business type. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital advertising service with moderate technical and security maturity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, improving accessibility, and expanding contact information to increase trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching etarget.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Etarget se operates in the technology and media sectors, providing programmatic advertising services that optimize digital campaigns for brands and agencies. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering specialized expertise in campaign optimization and measurement. The company maintains long-term partnerships with clients such as GroupM and Dentsu, indicating strong market positioning and reliability. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts and campaign management fees. The target customer segments include media agencies, publishers, and brand marketers seeking data-driven advertising solutions. The company demonstrates growth through client testimonials and a consistent brand presence. The partnership ecosystem includes industry bodies like IAB, enhancing credibility. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand transparency in security and compliance to further strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found, indicating a baseline secure environment. However, the absence of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. GDPR compliance is supported by a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, but no dedicated security or vulnerability disclosure pages exist. The security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhanced communication and technical controls to mitigate risks and improve stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  4. Improve website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses to enhance business credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Etarget se
Description
Etarget se provides programmatic and display advertising services focused on optimizing campaigns for attention, engagement, and conversions using data-driven approaches. They support media agencies, publishers, and brands to maximize campaign effectiveness.
Key services
Ad format adaptation, Attention-optimized campaign media, Advanced measurement & insights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Swiper.js, Cookie Script, Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
lfeeder
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy protection.
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses found, only email contact.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information publicly available.
  7. Website content is professional and targeted at media agencies and brands.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Cookie consent is managed via a third-party script, supporting GDPR compliance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO metadata and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Technical risks include lack of visible security headers and limited public security documentation, which could impact trust and compliance. Opportunities exist to modernize SEO and accessibility to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with etarget.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review etarget.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.