Skip to main content

Security report for esri.com

Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Esri, officially Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., is a leading enterprise in GIS software and spatial analytics technology. Their website showcases a comprehensive portfolio of GIS products and services targeted primarily at business and government sectors. The company maintains a strong market position as a pioneer and leader in geospatial technology, offering solutions such as ArcGIS Online, ArcGIS Pro, and ArcGIS Enterprise. The website content is professionally curated, reflecting a mature and established business model focused on software licensing, developer tools, and spatial data management. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Adobe Experience Manager as its CMS, Adobe Target for personalization, and Calcite Components for UI consistency. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Pardot, LinkedIn Insight, and Mouseflow, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing and user experience strategy. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with strong performance metrics. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with robust SSL configuration and implements key security headers like CSP and HSTS. Cookie consent management is in place, demonstrating GDPR compliance. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, though the absence of WHOIS data is unusual for a large enterprise and warrants monitoring. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and providing clear incident response contacts to enhance transparency and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of esri.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching esri.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention esri.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24,483
Employees
0
Customers
24,231
Third parties
252
Weak passwords
10%

136 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for esri.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Esri operates in the technology sector specializing in GIS and spatial analytics software. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive and integrated GIS platform, strong brand recognition, and extensive product ecosystem. The business model is primarily software licensing and subscription-based services, supplemented by developer tools and consulting. Target customers include government agencies, enterprises, and developers requiring advanced geospatial capabilities. The company demonstrates growth through continuous product innovation and digital marketing sophistication. Partnerships and integrations with cloud and analytics providers enhance its ecosystem. The website reflects a mature organization with global reach and enterprise scale.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms indicates attention to privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contact, and vulnerability disclosure program suggests gaps in transparency and incident readiness. These gaps could impact stakeholder trust and compliance with emerging regulations such as NIS2. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security governance documents and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security governance and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security and abuse emails.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR and global compliance.
  5. Enhance transparency by listing certifications and compliance frameworks adhered to by the organization.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
Description
Esri’s GIS software is the most powerful mapping & spatial analytics technology available. Learn about Esri’s geospatial mapping software for business and government.
Key services
GIS software, Mapping, Spatial analytics, Developer technology
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Adobe Target, Adobe Launch, Calcite Components, OneTrust Consent Management, Mouseflow, Pardot, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Calcite Design System
Platforms
ArcGIS Online, ArcGIS Enterprise
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Mouseflow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Bizible
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Pardot, Mouseflow, Adobe Target
Marketing tools
Adobe Target, Pardot, Bizible
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at business and government GIS users.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a large enterprise domain.
  6. Multiple social media and official channels linked, enhancing trust.
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging Adobe Target for personalization and Calcite Components for UI consistency. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, including Pardot, LinkedIn Insight, and Mouseflow, indicating a sophisticated digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a high-quality user experience and robust marketing capabilities. Opportunities exist to improve hosting transparency and reduce third-party dependencies where possible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 90/100 +1Low17 findingsView report
  2. 89/100 +19Low19 findingsView report
  3. 70/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with esri.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review esri.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.