Skip to main content

Security report for esiee.fr

ESIEE Paris · Education · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ESIEE Paris is a well-established French engineering school specializing in technological innovation, digital, energy, and environmental transitions. It holds prestigious accreditations such as CTI and CGE and offers a broad range of engineering programs including apprenticeships and international degrees. The website reflects a professional and modern educational institution with clear navigation, comprehensive content, and strong trust indicators including certifications and alumni references. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes robust cookie consent mechanisms ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie management but lacks explicit security policies and visible security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces domain trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy supported by external partnerships and certifications.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching esiee.fr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention esiee.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,260
Employees
12
Customers
2,107
Third parties
2,141
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-05-03 · 75 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for esiee.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –charon.lan.esiee.fr2026-05-03
  • –hades.esiee.fr2026-04-25
  • –bde.esiee.fr2025-10-29
  • –webaurion.esiee.fr2025-08-22
  • –bde.esiee.fr2025-08-18

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution targets students, parents, and professional partners in the education and technology sectors. It maintains a strong market position as a top-ranked engineering school in the Île-de-France region, offering diverse programs and fostering research and industry collaboration. The business model is centered on education services, continuing education, and partnerships with companies. The presence of multiple certifications and partnerships with recognized organizations enhances its credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include active events, international programs, and a strong alumni network.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. It employs HTTPS and cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ESIEE Paris
Description
Grande école d'ingénieur spécialisée dans les transitions numérique, énergétique et environnementale. Classée dans le groupe A, habilitée par la CTI, membre de la CGE.
Key services
Engineering degree programs, Apprenticeship engineering programs, International programs, Bachelor and professional licenses, Continuing education, Research and industry partnerships
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Swiper.js, Tarteaucitron.js (cookie consent), Matomo (analytics), Plausible (analytics), FontAwesome icons
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent management with Tarteaucitron.js
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Plausible
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Plausible
Marketing tools
Tarteaucitron.js
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on engineering education and research
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  6. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and standard web technologies
  7. Multiple external trusted partners and certifications displayed
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Cookie consent is managed via Tarteaucitron.js, and analytics are performed using Matomo and Plausible, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and hosting transparency. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with esiee.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review esiee.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.