Skip to main content

Security report for ergopix.com

Ergopix Sàrl · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ergopix Sàrl is a small Swiss web agency based in Vevey specializing in custom web design and development of web tools, primarily using WordPress and Drupal CMS platforms. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking bespoke digital solutions, positioning itself as a niche local expert with a professional online presence. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, and performance optimization tools like WP Rocket, resulting in fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though improvements are recommended in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is adequate with a privacy policy present, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the active, professional website mitigates concerns. Overall, the site is well-designed, functional, and trustworthy with room for enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ergopix.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ergopix operates as a service provider in the technology sector, focusing on web design and custom web tool development. Its business model revolves around delivering tailored digital solutions to clients, leveraging popular CMS platforms. The company maintains a clear contact presence and a portfolio of projects, indicating active client engagement. Market positioning is local and specialized, with no evidence of large-scale operations or subsidiaries. The absence of social media links and limited external partnerships suggests a focused, boutique approach. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing web maintenance services. Growth indicators are not explicit but the professional website and updated content imply ongoing business activity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, uses cryptographic JavaScript libraries for encryption, and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security events. Cookie consent mechanisms are absent despite the presence of a cookie policy, which may affect GDPR compliance. No known vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the site content or scripts. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good foundational practices but room for improvement in headers and policy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  2. Add an incident response page or security contact email to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to align with GDPR and enhance user privacy compliance.
  4. Publish terms of service to provide legal clarity and protect both the company and its clients.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ergopix Sàrl
Description
Agence Web basée à Vevey en Suisse spécialisée dans la création de sites Internet, le Web Design et les CMS Wordpress & Drupal.
Key services
Web design, Custom web tools development, CMS solutions (Wordpress, Drupal)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, WP Rocket, CryptX
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cryptographic JS library (CryptX) for encryption

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in registry
  4. Privacy and cookie policies present but cookie consent mechanism missing
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. Contact info clearly displayed with company domain email and phone
  7. No social media links detected in provided HTML
  8. No forms detected on homepage content
  9. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and jQuery library, supported by performance optimization via WP Rocket and encryption through CryptX. The site uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques ensuring good mobile usability. Lazy loading and deferred JavaScript improve page load speed. No hosting provider details were found in the content. The technical implementation is robust with clean HTML and CSS, good SEO meta tags, and structured data in JSON-LD format enhancing search engine understanding. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site does not use analytics or tracking services, minimizing privacy risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant web presence with minor opportunities for further enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ergopix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ergopix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.