Skip to main content

Security report for erecruiter.pl

eRecruitment Solutions sp. z o.o. · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eRecruitment Solutions sp. z o.o. operates the eRecruiter platform, a leading Applicant Tracking System (ATS) widely used in Poland by over 2,000 companies. The platform supports recruitment automation, candidate communication, and HR-business collaboration, offering modules such as onboarding, employee referrals, and career page creation. The company has a strong market position with a 15-year history and a professional digital presence in both Polish and English languages. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and OneTrust for cookie consent, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved and a security.txt file is absent. The domain WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the company's claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with GDPR, targeting HR professionals and businesses seeking recruitment solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erecruiter.pl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
35
Email security
97
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets HR professionals and businesses in Poland and internationally, offering SaaS recruitment software with a focus on automation and candidate experience. Their competitive advantage lies in their market leadership in Poland, comprehensive feature set, and long-standing presence. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for the ATS platform. The company maintains active social media channels and invests in digital marketing and analytics. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified. The business model is focused on SaaS delivery with continuous feature enhancements and customer support. Growth indicators include a large client base and ongoing content marketing through blogs, e-books, webinars, and case studies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of cookie consent via OneTrust, indicating GDPR compliance. Use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts is evident, with no exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in the HTML. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security.txt file suggest room for improvement. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could hinder vulnerability reporting. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor DNS security gap. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
eRecruitment Solutions sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eRecruitment Solutions sp. z o.o.
Description
eRecruiter to system ATS do rekrutacji, wspierający organizacje w pozyskiwaniu talentów, komunikacji z kandydatami i współpracy HR z biznesem
Key services
Applicant Tracking System, Recruitment automation, Candidate communication, HR and business collaboration, Onboarding, Employee referral module, Career page builder
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Bing Ads, Google Analytics, CallPage widget, YUI CSS Reset, Animate.css, AOS (Animate On Scroll), mmenu.js, Slick Carousel, RangeSlider, LightGallery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Bing UET
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Bing Ads, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET
Marketing tools
CallPage
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professional and content-rich with clear business focus on ATS software
  2. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration
  3. Use of multiple reputable analytics and marketing tools
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  5. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation
  6. No explicit security.txt or incident response contacts found
  7. No visible security headers beyond HTTPS implied
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including CSS frameworks (Animate.css, AOS), JavaScript libraries (Slick Carousel, mmenu.js), and analytics/tracking tools (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses OneTrust for cookie consent, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erecruiter.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erecruiter.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.