Skip to main content

Security report for erasenoise.com

EraseNoise · Technology

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EraseNoise is a specialized online service focused on removing background noise from audio and video files. It offers users the ability to upload various audio and video formats directly, including MP4 and MOV, and provides a free 30-second preview of cleaned audio before purchase. The platform targets content creators such as YouTubers, podcasters, educators, teams, students, and editors, positioning itself as a convenient and efficient alternative to traditional desktop audio editing software. The business model combines free previews with paid minute packs and subscription plans, catering to both casual and professional users. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies, likely including React, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO, providing a smooth user experience. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and likely standard security headers, although explicit security and privacy policies are not present on the site. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good baseline protections with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks publicly available privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts, which are important for compliance and user trust. The domain registration data is consistent and transparent, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, EraseNoise presents a professional and trustworthy service with strong technical implementation but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 2 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga_NRZ4MB61JY, _ga). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erasenoise.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
53
Email security
89
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
80
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention erasenoise.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for erasenoise.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EraseNoise occupies a niche in the technology sector, providing an online multimedia application for noise removal in audio and video content. Its competitive advantage lies in direct video upload capability, free preview functionality, and a pay-by-the-minute pricing model, appealing to a broad range of content creators and professionals. The service supports multiple user personas including creators, podcasters, educators, teams, students, and editors, indicating a diversified target market. The business model leverages subscription and minute packs, suggesting recurring revenue streams. The website's clear branding, structured data, and sample content demonstrate a mature digital presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified, indicating a focused standalone operation.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and likely standard security headers in place. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contact information represents compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and other data protection regulations. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site is secure from a technical standpoint but should improve its compliance and incident response readiness to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and abuse reports.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Consider appointing and disclosing a Data Protection Officer contact if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EraseNoise
Description
EraseNoise is an online tool that removes background noise from audio and video files. Users can upload MP3, WAV, M4A, AAC, OGG, OPUS, FLAC audio files or MP4, MOV, M4V, WebM video files up to 2 GB. The service provides a free 30-second preview of cleaned audio/video before purchase. The video picture remains untouched while the soundtrack is cleaned. The platform targets creators, podcasters, educators, teams, students, and editors.
Key services
Background noise removal from audio and video, Free 30-second preview, Direct video upload and cleaned video download, Audio download as WAV, Pay by the minute packs and Pro subscription
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
React or similar SPA framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with async loading
  • File uploads with size limits and accepted types

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional and focused website for audio/video background noise removal
  2. Clear user workflow with free preview and paid processing
  3. Modern web technologies and good performance
  4. Lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found
  6. Good SEO and accessibility features
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework, likely React, with module preloading for performance optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization, website, and application. The hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Performance appears fast with asynchronous script loading and minimal blocking resources. The site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration. No technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Opportunities include adding explicit security headers and improving privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erasenoise.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erasenoise.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.