Skip to main content

Security report for eproma.lv

SIA Eproma Latvia · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Eproma Latvia is a professional provider of video surveillance, fire detection, and security alarm systems primarily serving the Latvian market. The company offers a range of products including cameras, sensors, alarm systems, and related accessories, targeting both business clients and professional users. Their website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on technology and retail sectors. Technically, the site is built on the PrestaShop CMS platform and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is HTTPS secured and uses reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms, indicating a reasonable security posture. However, explicit privacy policies and terms of service are not clearly found, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting full trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eproma.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a regional leader in security and fire detection systems in Latvia, offering a comprehensive product catalog and services including installation and repair. Their business model combines B2B and B2C sales, focusing on professional customers and businesses requiring reliable security solutions. The presence of multiple language versions (Latvian, English, Russian) suggests a strategy to serve diverse customer segments. The use of advanced tracking and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing approach. However, the absence of detailed corporate information such as founding year, parent company, or subsidiaries limits deeper business intelligence insights. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages trust signals like Google site verification and Facebook Pixel.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could improve by implementing additional security headers and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance security transparency.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and consistent with website business information to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Eproma Latvia
Description
Profesionalios ir patikimos vaizdo stebėjimo sistemos, sertifikuotos gaisrinės signalizacijos ir apsauginės signalizacijos sistemos. Patrauklios nuolaidos profesionalams!
Key services
Video surveillance systems, Fire detection systems, Security alarm systems, Sales of related hardware and accessories, Installation and repair services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery, Owl Carousel, LightSlider, NoUISlider, Magnific Popup, PrestaShop CMS
Platforms
PrestaShop
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and modern tracking and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  6. Contact phone number +371 270 00917 clearly displayed with context.
  7. No email addresses explicitly found in provided HTML snippet.
  8. Site built on PrestaShop CMS with multiple JS libraries for UI and tracking.
  9. Content is professional, focused on security and fire detection systems.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the PrestaShop CMS platform, utilizing a variety of JavaScript libraries for UI components such as Owl Carousel, LightSlider, and Magnific Popup. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. The lack of some security headers and incomplete privacy documentation represent technical debt and compliance risks. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eproma.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eproma.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.