Skip to main content

Security report for epicfrog.com

SIA "Epic Frog" · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EpicFrog is a Latvia-based custom software development and design company established in 2009. They offer a broad range of services including web and mobile development, product design, cloud development, machine learning, quality assurance, and DevOps. The company targets businesses seeking professional software solutions and emphasizes a flexible, agile development process. Their market position is that of a specialized, professional service provider with a versatile technology stack and experienced team. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as React, Laravel, Vue.js, and Symfony, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security measures include HTTPS, CSRF tokens, and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with room for improvement in DNS security and HTTP headers. Privacy compliance is lacking due to the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching epicfrog.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EpicFrog operates in the technology sector, focusing on custom software development and design services. Their competitive advantage lies in a versatile technology stack and an agile, client-focused development process. Revenue streams likely include project-based development, long-term maintenance contracts, and consulting services. The target customers are businesses requiring web, mobile, and cloud solutions, including industries such as ecommerce, healthcare, fintech, logistics, and construction. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear service offerings and a transparent business registration in Latvia. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and a flexible development methodology. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses CSRF tokens and Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating awareness of basic web security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent potential vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie policies, although a cookie consent banner is present. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Epic Frog"
Registration number
40103265774
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Epic Frog"
Description
A custom software development company EpicFrog specialising in Web development, Mobile development, Product Design, Cloud development & DevOps services.
Key services
Web development, Mobile development, Product Design, Cloud development, Machine Learning, Quality Assurance, DevOps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Node.js, Laravel, Vue.js, Symfony, Go, Python, Java
Frameworks
React, Laravel, Vue.js, Symfony
Platforms
Web, Mobile (iOS, Android)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Google Fonts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and detailed service descriptions.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is available including a company email and physical address in Latvia.
  4. Security practices include HTTPS, CSRF token, and Google reCAPTCHA on forms.
  5. No DNSSEC enabled and no explicit security headers detected, which could be improved.
  6. No evidence of advertising networks or extensive tracking beyond reCAPTCHA.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation since 2009.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including React, Node.js, Laravel, Vue.js, Symfony, Go, Python, and Java, indicating a mature and versatile development environment. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, supported by AWS DNS servers. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts such as Google reCAPTCHA. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Technical debt appears low with up-to-date libraries and frameworks, but improvements in security headers and DNS configuration are recommended to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with epicfrog.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review epicfrog.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.