Skip to main content

Security report for eotlabs.io

EoT Labs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EoT Labs is a technology company focused on pioneering the next generation of the Internet of Things, branded as the Economy of Things. They develop and support open-source projects centered on the Web3 Machine Economy, targeting enterprises and technology companies interested in IoT and blockchain integration. The company positions itself as an innovative leader with strong partnerships and endorsements from former executives of major global corporations. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts and Google Analytics, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling, though explicit security headers and policies are absent. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with no detected vulnerabilities or suspicious content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 25 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eotlabs.io

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EoT Labs operates in the emerging IoT and Web3 technology sector, focusing on enabling autonomous machine-to-machine economic interactions. Their business model revolves around technology development, incubation, and open-source project support. The company leverages strategic partnerships with major automotive and technology firms, enhancing credibility and market reach. Their target customers are enterprises seeking blockchain and IoT integration solutions. The presence of testimonials from industry leaders and partner logos indicates a strong ecosystem and potential for growth. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand and professional content, though specific founding year and corporate registration details are not publicly disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and forms are securely implemented via Webflow. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could impact readiness for security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a technology company website but could be improved by adding formal security policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer contact information for data protection inquiries.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and ensure inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EoT Labs
Description
EoT Labs is building the next generation of the Internet of Things, the Economy of Things. They develop, incubate and support open-source projects focused on the Web3 Machine Economy.
Key services
Open-source project development, Incubation and support for Web3 Machine Economy projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts (Poppins), Google Analytics (gtag.js), jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow CMS/hosting
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form submission via Webflow forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request and privacy protection.
  3. Website uses Webflow CMS and hosting with modern web technologies.
  4. Strong presence of partner logos and testimonials from notable industry leaders.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerabilities or security issues detected in the visible content.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with a clear navigation structure. The use of Webflow ensures a CMS-backed infrastructure with CDN hosting, contributing to reliability and scalability. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and explicit SEO metadata beyond basics. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for enhancements in security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eotlabs.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eotlabs.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.