Skip to main content

Security report for eolab.com

eo · Technology · Australia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eo is a specialized sports technology company focused on enhancing athletic performance through innovative products and scientific research. Their offerings include the SwimBETTER system and the PolarCap concussion recovery treatment, targeting athletes and sports professionals. The website demonstrates a professional digital presence with good design, mobile optimization, and integration of modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though some security headers and policies are missing. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, supporting user trust. However, the absence of WHOIS registrant data and lack of explicit security and incident response policies slightly reduce transparency. Overall, eo presents as a credible and innovative player in the sports technology sector with room for improvement in security disclosures and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eolab.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eo operates in the niche sports technology sector, leveraging scientific research to develop performance enhancement and recovery products. Their business model centers on product sales and platform services, supported by endorsements from notable athletes. The company targets athletes and sports science communities, positioning itself as an innovator with a strong brand identity. Marketing efforts are robust, utilizing multiple social media channels and advanced analytics. The lack of detailed company registration data and physical contact information suggests a small-sized entity focused on digital engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes subdomains related to product platforms, indicating integrated service offerings. Growth potential is supported by scientific backing and athlete endorsements, though further transparency in corporate data could enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure form handling, indicating a baseline security maturity. Integration of tracking and marketing scripts is extensive but managed with consent mechanisms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact, highlight gaps in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good technical controls but lacking in policy transparency and formal incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security posture.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to broaden user inclusivity and meet regulatory standards.
  5. Increase WHOIS transparency or provide verified company registration details on the website to strengthen trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eo
Description
eo is a sports technology innovator working with sports science to unlock human potential by improving performance, accelerating recovery, preventing injury, and aiding rehabilitation.
Key services
SwimBETTER product, PolarCap concussion recovery treatment, Sports performance technology, Recovery and rehabilitation solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on sports technology.
  3. Multiple social media channels and marketing tools integrated.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency but does not alone indicate fraud.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Marketing and analytics tools include HubSpot, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no significant delays detected in content loading. No CMS was explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eolab.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eolab.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.