Skip to main content

Security report for enviso.io

Vintia · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vintia is a technology company specializing in digital transformation solutions primarily for the energy sector. The company appears to be a medium-sized B2B service provider with a focus on technology consulting and energy industry solutions. The website is built using modern web technologies such as Gatsby and React, with integrated marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and contact information, which limits transparency and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no DNSSEC or security headers detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enviso.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized technology partner in the energy sector, focusing on digital transformation and technology consulting. The business model is B2B, targeting energy companies needing technology solutions. The domain age of 2016 supports a stable market presence. Marketing tools and tracking indicate active user engagement efforts. Lack of visible contact details and legal information on the site suggests room for improvement in business credibility and customer trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly linked from the website content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for protecting against common web attacks. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, indicating limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The WHOIS data shows a stable domain registration with clientTransferProhibited status, which is positive. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  4. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vintia
Description
Vintia is a company operating in the technology and energy sectors, providing digital transformation and technology solutions primarily for the energy industry.
Key services
Digital transformation, Technology consulting, Energy sector solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React (Gatsby), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by script sources)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Google Ads
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Pardot Marketing Automation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Gatsby/React).
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage HTML.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly present in the HTML content.
  5. Tracking and marketing scripts are present indicating moderate user tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is registered until 2026 with stable registrar and no privacy protection.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. No explicit business address or legal company information found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Gatsby/React) with asynchronous loading of marketing and analytics scripts. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization rated good. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS uses multiple providers without DNSSEC. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Technical debt appears low but improvements in security configurations and content completeness are needed to enhance overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enviso.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enviso.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.