Skip to main content

Security report for envisionui.io

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Envision by Sitevision' appears to be a technology-focused site built using the Gatsby framework and includes the jQuery library. The site content is minimal, primarily consisting of styling and layout code, with no substantive business descriptions, contact information, or policy documents present. This limits the ability to fully assess the business model, target audience, or market position. Technically, the site uses modern static site generation technology, which supports good performance and mobile optimization, though no explicit performance metrics are available. Security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers, privacy policies, and contact information for incident response. No analytics or advertising tools are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms but lacks critical compliance and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching envisionui.io

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of explicit business information, the company behind the site cannot be clearly identified. The site title suggests a product or service named 'Envision' by 'Sitevision', indicating a possible technology or UI/UX design focus. The absence of contact details, privacy policies, or terms of service reduces business credibility and transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The business model and revenue streams are not discernible from the content. The site likely targets technology professionals or clients interested in UI solutions, but this is speculative. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships cannot be assessed.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which are essential for protecting users against common web vulnerabilities. The site uses HTTPS (implied by the URL scheme), but SSL configuration details are not available. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. No incident response contacts or security policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and ensure SSL/TLS is properly configured.
  5. Enhance website content with business descriptions, terms of service, and trust indicators to improve credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, jQuery
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern static site generator Gatsby with jQuery library.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected in the provided content.
  4. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  5. No Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present.
  6. No security headers or meta tags related to security detected in the HTML.
  7. Website content is minimal with mostly CSS and layout styling, lacking substantive textual content.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected except jQuery.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  10. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Gatsby, a modern React-based static site generator, which supports fast loading and good mobile responsiveness. The inclusion of jQuery is noted but may be legacy or for specific UI interactions. The site uses custom CSS and fonts loaded via webfont files. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML. Performance is likely moderate given static generation but no explicit metrics are available. Accessibility features are basic, with some focus-visible styles present. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta description or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD, which could improve search engine understanding. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but underutilized in terms of content and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with envisionui.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review envisionui.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.