Skip to main content

Security report for entigo.com

Entigo · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Entigo is a technology company specializing in container management platforms, site reliability engineering as a service, and hands-on training for development and platform teams. Positioned as a niche B2B provider, Entigo targets developers and enterprises adopting cloud-native containerized infrastructure. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through partnerships with AWS, Google Cloud, and Kubernetes certifications, supported by ISO 9001 quality management certification. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including Next.js and Strapi CMS, hosted on Vercel, delivering fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website reflects a professional, trustworthy, and mature digital presence suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching entigo.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Entigo operates in the technology sector focusing on cloud-native container management and DevOps services. Its business model combines SaaS platform offerings with managed SRE services and educational training, targeting enterprises and development teams. The company leverages strategic partnerships with major cloud providers and Kubernetes certification bodies to enhance credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include multiple certifications and awards such as the Gasell award. The company maintains a clear and consistent brand with comprehensive content and trust signals. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, managed services, and training fees. The partnership ecosystem is robust, including AWS, Google Cloud, CNCF, and Bureau Veritas. Strategic observations suggest Entigo is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for container orchestration and cloud reliability services.

Security posture

Entigo's website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of modern frameworks further enhance security. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program represents a compliance gap and potential risk in transparency. No security contact emails or security.txt files were found, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned privacy and cookie policies. Overall, Entigo shows good security hygiene but should improve transparency and incident readiness to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response plan and provide security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Entigo
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Entigo
Description
Entigo provides a self-service platform for managing containerized applications in the cloud, site reliability engineering as a service, and hands-on training for development and platform teams focused on container deployments.
Key services
Container management platform, Site reliability engineering (SRE) as a service, Training for container deployments and platform teams
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks with security features

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and responsive layout.
  2. Strong presence of trust indicators including certifications and partner logos.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Next.js, Strapi, Vercel).
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn, GitHub, YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js framework with React, hosted on Vercel, and uses Strapi as the CMS backend. This modern tech stack supports fast loading times, server-side rendering, and good SEO practices. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses optimized images with multiple resolutions. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The infrastructure is cloud-based, leveraging CDN and modern deployment pipelines. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and add more comprehensive SEO metadata. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and supports the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with entigo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review entigo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.