Skip to main content

Security report for enovetic.ch

enovetic · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

enovetic is a Swiss-based company specializing in software solutions and business process outsourcing for the personal leasing and pension fund sectors. Their offerings include digital platforms and expert services aimed at simplifying administration in work, health, and pension management. The company positions itself as a comprehensive service provider with a strong focus on HR-related outsourcing and software products tailored to their target audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Tailwind CSS and integrates advanced analytics and monitoring tools like Datadog RUM and Google Analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and bot protection via Cloudflare Turnstile, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policy. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business presence with good technical implementation and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enovetic.ch

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on HR software and outsourcing services for personal leasing and pension funds. Their business model revolves around providing digital platforms combined with expert consulting and outsourcing services. The market positioning is that of a specialized provider catering to institutions of social insurance, private individuals, and personal leasing companies. Key services include payroll outsourcing, legal services, financial services, health management, and pension fund outsourcing. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear target audience primarily in Switzerland. The presence of a LinkedIn profile and detailed service offerings suggest a mature business with growth potential and a professional partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in categories, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly configured, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are absent, which could impact readiness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
enovetic
Description
Softwarelösung für Personalverleih & Pensionskassen – HR Dienstleistungen: Effizientes Business Process Outsourcing.
Key services
EasyTemp | EasyMission, eLaw, Finanzdienstleistungen, Lohndienstleistungen, Rechtsdienstleistungen, Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement, Krankentaggeldlösung, eAbsence, Outsourcing für Pensionskassen, Berufliche Vorsorgelösung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Tailwind CSS, Datadog RUM, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, SweetAlert2
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog RUM
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Datadog RUM
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on software and outsourcing services for HR, personal leasing, and pension funds.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with opt-in and category management.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact likely on dedicated pages.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Social media presence confirmed via LinkedIn link.
  9. Good SEO and metadata implementation including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a modern and maintainable tech stack. It integrates Datadog RUM for real user monitoring and Google Analytics for traffic analysis, reflecting a mature approach to performance and user behavior tracking. The site uses Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection, enhancing security. Performance appears fast with optimized media and lazy loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessible navigation. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks are minimal but could be further reduced by implementing additional security headers and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enovetic.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enovetic.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.